subscribe to the RSS Feed

Saturday, August 22, 2026

Bloody Sunday British soldiers may face murder charges and criminal prosecution

Posted by Jim on October 21, 2013

 

Sunday Times says police action and questioning is already underway

By

PATRICK COUNIHAN,
IrishCentral Staff Writer

The British soldiers who killed 14 people on Bloody Sunday in Derry may be arrested and charged with murder or attempted murder.

The Sunday Times of London report says that up to 20 retired soldiers are likely to be arrested and questioned by police for murder, attempted murder or criminal injury over the shootings more than 40 years ago.

Britain’s Ministry of Defence has already started to hire lawyers to represent the soldiers, most of whom are now in their 60s and 70s.

They will be questioned under criminal caution about their roles in the shootings when soldiers who opened fire on participants in a Civil Rights march.

The British Army troops who killed the 14 Bloody Sunday victims may face prosecution in a trial which the paper says will reopen wounds from one of the most notorious incidents in the history of the Troubles.

The move comes three years after the 12-year inquiry by Lord Saville into the shootings produced its report.

The Saville Report concluded that all those shot by paratroopers during a Catholic civil rights march in the nationalist Bogside area of Derry in January 1972 were unarmed. It said the killings were both ‘unjustified and unjustifiable’.

The enquiry said the army had lost control of the situation, that the soldiers had fired first and some of them had then lied to cover up their culpability.

After the report was published, British Prime Minister David Cameron issued a formal apology to the families on behalf of the nation.

The Sunday Times reports that a source close to the police who has seen government files has confirmed the possibility of court action against the soldiers.

The source said: “This is the beginning. It is the first time the soldiers will have been interviewed formally by police as part of a murder investigation. It is possible that some of the soldiers will be prosecuted.

“Interviews under police caution are expected imminently.”

A spokesman for the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) told the paper that the time scale might be longer.

The spokesman said: “Preliminary work has begun into what will be a lengthy and complex investigation into the events of January 30, 1972.

“For the investigation to be as comprehensive and effective as possible, police will be asking for public support in the form of witnesses who gave evidence to the Saville inquiry now making statements to detectives.

“This is because police are precluded from using Saville testimony in a criminal investigation.”

The Saville inquiry found that 26 soldiers, including privates, corporals, lance corporals and sergeants had opened fire on Bloody Sunday, although not all of them hit marchers.

It said two soldiers, identified only as Lance-Corporal F and Soldier G, probably shot ‘eight or 10 people’.

The paper says most are still alive but their names have never been made public to protect them from reprisals.

TDs surveilled by PSNI Special Branch

Posted by Jim on October 15, 2013

 

Three elected Leinster House TDs were video-recorded by specialist PSNI police as they attempted to speak to the family of a jailed republican activist, it has emerged.

Family and friends of eirigi member Stephen Murney had gathered at Newry courthouse last week for a hearing on ‘trumped up’ charges against the outspoken republican involving items of clothing and computer images of police.

The three TDs – Clare Daly, Maureen O’Sullivan and Mick Wallace – had attended the court to observe proceedings in the case.

One of the TDs directly challenged the PSNI as to the legality of recording what was essentially a confidential conversation between the three parliamentarians and Mr Murney’s partner and parents.

The PSNI also continuously monitored and video-recorded all those taking part in a protest against his internment outside the courthouse. Those present at the committal hearing only observed a further judicial delay as the hearing was postponed for a further two weeks.

It later emerged that the eirigi man was forcibly strip-searched twice in Maghaberry prison as he was taken to court and then again on his return from prison.

Speaking after the hearing, eirigi’s Breandan Mac Cionnaith said, “the PSNI, the prosecution and the court system in the Six Counties have successfully colluded with each other to ensure that Stephen has now been imprisoned for almost a year.

“Wednesday’s hearing again resulted in yet more unacceptable delays with the dual purpose of prolonging Stephen’s imprisonment and penalising his family.

“Despite all this, Stephen and his family remain in good spirits and remain confident that he will be completely vindicated of those charges laid against him.”

COREY DELAY

Meanwhile, a hearing for republican prisoner of conscience Martin Corey was due to be held this week but was also postponed by Parole Commissioners.

The 63-year-old republican has been interned by a British order since April 2010. He is facing no charges and authorities have refused to tell him or his legal team why he was detained.

Campaigners say the Lurgan man has the right to go before Parole Commissioners for a review every 12 months but that he hasn’t been given that opportunity in more than two years.

South Down MP Margaret Ritchie says she intends to “make representations” to British Direct Ruler Theresa Villiers on the matter.

“It is a form of internment,” she said. “The bottom line is we need to get the Martin Corey case resolved for himself, his family and the sake of the wider community.”

A long-time friend of the Lurgan republican, Jim McIlmurray, said Mr Corey already served the equivalent of a seven-year prison sentence and spoke of his concerns about the state of his health.

“If Martin had committed a crime they would have charged him at this stage,” he said.

Mr Corey’s case was raised in the Dail this week by Independent TD Maureen Sullivan, while Clare Daly TD raised Mr Murney’s case.

 Sandy Boyer

Unionist threat to use violence, nothing new

Posted by Jim on October 12, 2013

 

By Brian Feeney (for Irish News)

 

 

Sinn Fein spokesmen have been queuing up to express disappointment at

what they complain is a lack of unionist leadership. Where have they

been? Perhaps they have read no history but most of them have lived

through the whole period of the Troubles and therefore the present

stance of unionist politicians should come as no surprise to them.

Unionists have always used violence or the threat of violence to get

their way. For them to join in common cause with the UVF in north and

east Belfast is entirely consistent with past behaviour.

 

Forty years ago exactly senior figures in what was then the Official

Unionist Party and the DUP sat down with loyalist terrorists to conspire

to destroy any attempt to establish a power-sharing executive. The

following year 1974, members of both parties sat around the table with

the UDA and UVF to organise and carry out the UWC strike which brought

the north to a standstill. Just run your mind over all the other

instances of unionist politicians standing four square with men from

organisations which were relentlessly killing Catholics. Indeed

unionists voted men from the same organisations into ceremonial

positions in councils. Then there’s the ‘Carson Trail’, the ‘Third

Farce’, the 1986 ‘Day of Action’ against the Anglo-Irish Agreement, not

to mention Ulster Resistance with Peter Robinson looking ridiculous in

his red beret and glasses. Why then should anyone in Sinn Fein be

surprised or disappointed to find Robinson throwing in his lot with the

wilder shores of unionism? Don’t forget Robinson has form. Form in the

shape of a criminal conviction for leading a mob into Clontibret which

terrorised the village and injured two gardai.

 

After a brief flirtation with moderation in 2011 Robinson returned to

form last year when he belatedly added his name to the notorious letter

signed by practically every senior unionist elected in Belfast which

attacked the Parades Commission and encouraged defiance of its

determinations. Oh, and by the way those determinations have the force

of law though we’re all waiting (but not with bated breath) for anyone

to be convicted for a breach of a determination. What we’re witnessing

in the last year is a unionist counter-revolution against the Good

Friday Agreement. Piece by piece and bit by bit unionists are working to

dismantle the agreement. They have stopped working the executive. It

operates only in sectarian silos, each department a law unto itself.

Robinson’s unilateral U-turn on the Maze/Long Kesh deal means that there

is no Programme for Government any more, not mind you that it was

operative. However, Robinson’s U-turn on an item in the programme is a

precedent which means that he can walk away from any item with impunity.

 

You can spot the next target easily because Robinson’s next position is

Jim Allister’s current one. Whatever Allister sets his sights on is

where Robinson will be in a couple of months. Therefore the next target

is the definition of victim. Unionists will refuse to operate any deal

on the past until republican victims are excluded from it. In this

context the fact that after meeting Dr Haass unionists scuttled up to

Twaddell Avenue to signal solidarity with the Orange Order and UVF is

highly significant. Letting loud mouths from the order do their dirty

work has always been normal practice for unionist politicians. You stand

behind them on the platform and in the case of Nelson McCausland last

weekend applaud with your hands below your waist so the crowd and

journalists, though not the cameras, can see but your presence endorses

and justifies the remarks.

 

You can see why Sinn Fein is disappointed and dismayed by this behaviour

but if they review the last year they can come to only one conclusion

and it is that unionism has not changed in any way. The DUP has always

opposed the Good Friday Agreement, its principles and underlying

concepts. Now with the support of loyalist mobs they feel justified in

stopping operating it. Many in Sinn Fein now question whether they have

a partner in what they still call ‘government’. In the last year no DUP

minister has said a word to lead them to believe they have.

Museum to Premier “James Connolly, Labor” Exhibit

Posted by admin on October 11, 2013

The Museum is honored to have been selected by the government of Ireland to present an exhibit and related programs honoring James Connolly, the Irish labor movement, and the Dublin lockout of 1913.  At 11 a.m. on Friday, November 1, join the Museum and very special guest, the Ambassador Consul General of Ireland Noel Kilkenny, for a rededication of the James Connolly Memorial at the Riverfront Park in Troy, NY, at River St. & 2nd St. — assemble behind the Uncle Sam statue.

James Connolly

On Saturday, Nov. 2, at 12 noon, “Labor & Dignity: James Connolly in America” will open to the public for an extended presentation after being on view at the Irish Consulate in New York City.  The Museum’s public exhibit hours are Wednesday-Friday, 11 a.m. – 4 p.m. and Saturday-Sunday, 12 Noon – 4 p.m.  Metered parking on Albany streets weekdays, free on weekends.  Connolly, who lived briefly in Troy, NY, was not only a labor organizer, but also one of the seven signatories of the 1916 Easter Proclamation who paid for his patriotism with his life when all seven were executed for their roles in seeking Ireland’s independence.   The Museum is part of the team that helped plan the exhibit curated and produced by Glucksman Ireland House at New York University, in conjunction with Hofstra University, Rutgers University, the AFL-CIO, the National AOH, International Union of Operating Engineers, Irish American Labor Coalition and the Irish Congress of Trade Unions.

UVF must be ‘faced down’ over violence, marches – Sinn Fein

Posted by Jim on October 7, 2013

Sinn Fein First Minister Martin McGuinness has challenged unionists to  confront the paramilitary UVF in east Belfast, who he accused of being  closely linked to the anti-Catholic Orange Order.    He was speaking out amid increasing violence by the loyalist  organisation, including the shooting of a woman six times last week in  an apparent revenge attack.    Mr McGuinness said that had republicans been involved in the gun attack  on 24-year-old Jemma McGrath last Wednesday there would not have been  silence from unionist ranks in the assembly.    Citing his own condemnation of republicans in the past, he said there  was a need to “stand by the agreements that we have made”.    “It is about the commitment of all of us to face down violent  extremists, whether they be so-called dissident republicans or extreme  loyalists,” Mr McGuinness said.    “That is the test for this assembly and that is the test for this  executive and I think thus far serious questions have to be asked about  the commitment to stand by the PSNI.”    Mr McGuinness again said the Orange Order and the PUP (Progressive  Unionist Party) were “indistinguishable” from the UVF in north Belfast.    In response, an Orange Order spokesman rejected the comments.  He said  were a “cynical attempt to increase tensions”. The PUP claimed the  “unity of purpose” among unionists over flags and parades had “unnerved”  Sinn Fein.    But links between the organisations appeared to be in evidence again  this week as masked paramilitaries attempted to march into a nationalist  area of north Belfast to ‘complete’ a July 12th Orange Order parade.    Repeated attempts to stage a sectarian parade through Ardoyne and other  nationalist areas has been refused by the Parades Commission since the  summer.    Members of all three organisations were also busy last weekend when they  joined thousands of other hardline unionists and loyalists to mark the  founding of the UVF in west Belfast.    Last weekend the Orange Order again sought permission to allow a  loyalist parade through Ardoyne this Saturday — as a precondition for  future talks.  But this was again refused by the Parades Commission.    North Belfast Sinn Fein assembly member Gerry Kelly said the Orange  Order’s so-called ‘Twaddell initiative’ — named after the ten-week old  loyalist encampment at the interface between the two communities — was  an attempt to undermine the Parades Commission.    “The Orange Order has announced its intentions through the media without  discussing things with or providing prior notification… If they really  wanted to assist community relations or the Haass process an initiative  might be to move their protest off the interface at Twaddell,” he said.    “What needs to happen is direct dialogue, without preconditions in  place, between the local residents and the Orange Order.”    The Greater Ardoyne Residents’ Collective also denounced the idea “as  there is nothing cultural or religious about sectarian marchers  demanding to coat-trail through our community where they are clearly not  welcome,” they said.    “Any attempt to force them upon greater Ardoyne will be resisted by any  means necessary.”