subscribe to the RSS Feed

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Barnier to Britain: Tackle border or I won’t sign deal

Posted by Jim on April 30, 2018

John Monaghan. Irish News. Belfast. Monday, April 30, 2018

THE EU’s chief Brexit negotiator has warned the UK government he will not sign any agreement that fails to tackle The Border issue.

Michel Barnier made the remarks ahead of a two-day trip to Ireland with visits to border regions including Newry and Derry.

The chief negotiator said there would need to be “substantial progress” on The Border by the next major meeting of EU leaders at a summit

in June.

Last week the UK’s Brexit secretary David Davis suggested the EU was trying to create an “artificial deadline” in June as a negotiating tactic.

Mr Barnier will address the fourth plenary session of the Irish government’s all-island civic dialogue on Brexit in Dundalk, Co Louth, today.

The EU’s chief negotiator will cross the border to hear from business and lobby groups about the potential impact of Brexit.

Mr Barnier will host a round-table discussion in Newry today and has a similar engagement in Derry tomorrow.

The former EU regional policy commissioner last visited Northern Ireland in 2000 but in his current role travelled to the border in Co Louth last May.

DUP MEP Diane Dodds has rejected “missing an opportunity” by not meeting Mr Barnier during his visit this week.

Mr.s Dodds said she has already committed to meetings in London and could not meet him.

“I have many, many opportunities to speak to Michel Barnier and I never miss opportunities,” she said.

Last week Mrs. Dodds and Ulster Unionist MEP Jim Nicholson issued a joint statement welcoming Mr Barnier’s visit but expressed disappointment that it was announced by Sinn Féin MP Elisha McCallion.

The Republic’s foreign minister and tánaiste Simon Coveney said he was looking forward to welcoming Mr Barnier and updating attendees on the state of play in the negotiations.

“Mr Barnier and his team have demonstrated a keen understanding of the unique circumstances of the island of Ireland and they have Ireland’s full support. We look forward to continued close cooperation with the taskforce,” he said.

House Chaplain Was Asked to Resign. He Still Doesn’t Know Why.

Posted by Jim on April 29, 2018

“Catholic members on both sides are furious,” said the Rev. Patrick J. Conroy, who has served as the House chaplain since 2011.CreditTom Williams/CQ Roll Call, via Associated Press

The chaplain of the House said on Thursday that he was blindsided when Speaker Paul D. Ryan asked him to resign two weeks ago, a request that he complied with but was never given a reason for.

The sudden resignation of the chaplain, the Rev. Patrick J. Conroy, shocked members of both parties. He had served in the role since he was nominated in 2011 by Speaker John A. Boehner, a fellow Catholic. In an interview, Father Conroy was categorical: His departure was not voluntary.

“I was asked to resign, that is clear,” Father Conroy said. As for why, he added, “that is unclear.”

“I certainly wasn’t given anything in writing,” he said. “Catholic members on both sides are furious.”

Father Conroy said he received the news from Mr. Ryan’s chief of staff. “The speaker would like your resignation,” Father Conroy recalled being told. He complied.

“As you have requested, I hereby offer my resignation as the 60th chaplain of the United States House of Representatives,” Father Conroy wrote in a letter to Mr. Ryan several days later. “I wish all the best of the House of Representatives, and for your upcoming search for a worthy successor in the office of the chaplain.”

His final day will be May 24.

Father Conroy’s resignation is all the more contentious in Catholic circles because Mr. Ryan is a Catholic conservative, whereas Father Conroy is a Jesuit, a branch that is viewed by some as more liberal.

Asked whether differences in politics were a factor in his ouster, Father Conroy said: “I do not want to politicize this. I have thoughts about it, but I am not contributing to that.”

But, he said, Capitol Hill is an inherently political place. “There are Catholics who are Republicans and there are Catholics who are Democrats,” he said. “I don’t know if there is a religious divide; there certainly is a political one.”

Though Father Conroy said he did not know whether politics were behind his departure, he pointed to a prayer he had given on the House floor in November, when Congress was debating tax overhaul legislation.

“May all members be mindful that the institutions and structures of our great nation guarantee the opportunities that have allowed some to achieve great success, while others continue to struggle,” he prayed. “May their efforts these days guarantee that there are not winners and losers under new tax laws, but benefits balanced and shared by all Americans.”

About a week later, Father Conroy said, he heard from the speaker’s office. “A staffer came down and said, We are upset with this prayer; you are getting too political,” he said. “It suggests to me that there are members who have talked to him about being upset with that prayer.”

Shortly after, when he saw Mr. Ryan himself, Father Conroy said that the speaker told him, “Padre, you just got to stay out of politics.”

“That is what I have tried to do for seven years,” Father Conroy said. “It doesn’t sound political to me.”

“If you are hospital chaplain, you are going to pray about health,” he added. “If you are a chaplain of Congress, you are going to pray about what Congress is doing.”

Father Conroy said that was the only time anyone from the speaker’s office had ever chastised him for veering into the political realm. “I’ve never been talked to about being too political in seven years,” he said.

A congressional aide for Mr. Ryan said that no specific prayer had led to the decision.

Father Conroy said that his only communication with Mr. Ryan or his office since he was asked to resign came on Wednesday morning, when the speaker thanked him for his seven years of service before the House welcomed President Emmanuel Macron of France.

Father Conroy said he did not ask Mr. Ryan why he was asked to resign, and he does not plan to contest his departure. “I do not want to debate this,” he said. “My understanding going into this is that I serve at the prerogative of the speaker.”

But lawmakers from both parties are demanding answers.

Representatives Walter B. Jones, Republican of North Carolina, and Gerald E. Connolly, Democrat of Virginia, are circulating a letter for their colleagues to sign, asking Mr. Ryan for more information.

“I’m very upset,” Mr. Jones said. “If this is true about the prayer, and we have freedom of religion in America, how about freedom of religion on the floor of the House?”

“The members of the House vote for the chaplain,” he continued. “This is not a one-man decision. The House should have the facts of whatever the problem is.”

Mr. Connolly said he was worried about the precedent Mr. Ryan’s decision could set. The letter asks the speaker for a description of the process that was followed, and for a justification of the decision.

“We believe that, absent such details, questions will inevitably arise about the politicization of the process for hiring and dismissing a House chaplain,” the letter says. “Not revealing such details could also risk resurrecting prior questions of religious bias.”

“Pat is a fairly popular figure in the House,” Mr. Connolly said. “He’s counseled people and tended to their personal and spiritual needs. This is a personal and jarring decision that affects all of us in a big way.”

Because of the lack of clarity surrounding his resignation, Father Conroy said that he had been fielding calls from friends and House members, some inaccurately congratulating him on his retirement or worrying that he was sick.

“They asked me why I am leaving, why I am abandoning them, congratulations on your retirement, what is next,” he said. “To which I say, ‘I wasn’t looking for a job.’”

“For the most part, that information has been met by shock,” he continued. “That is the gratifying part.”

Father Conroy said that he had thoroughly enjoyed being the House chaplain, and that he had not politicized his work.

“I have found it myself to be personally liberating because I have not been allowed to engage in the politics of the day, which has been very healthy for me,” he said. “I’m grateful that that was my ministry.”

When Pope Francis visited the United States in 2015, Father Conroy gave him a personal blessing in Spanish. He has traveled with congressional delegations to Southeast Asia and to the Middle East. He has also acted as personal spiritual adviser to many members of both parties, and to their families.

“I’m going to miss that kind of stuff,” Father Conroy said. But, he added, “There will be another ministry.”

“CATHOLIC MASS IS EVIL.”

Posted by Jim on April 28, 2018

“Every time since 1920 when it appeared that Catholics in Northern Ireland might be making a little progress — or being seen as getting uppity— right-wing, fundamentalists were magically produced to preach odious anti-Catholic bigotry. It, of course, had nothing to do with true religion but, rather, all about “keeping Catholics in their place”—maintaining the injustice of England’s Orange State.  

The latest example of this appalling and deeply offensive sectarian strategy appears in today’s Irish News of Belfast: “CATHOLIC MASS IS EVIL.” (See below).

 And, to make it even more atrocious, a co-founder of the DUP —and a key ally of the leader of the DUP delegation in the British Parliament— brazenly defends this appalling anti-Catholicism.

How can the Beloved Community be built up on such bigotry and hatred? Could the Beloved Community in the United States be built up on Jim Crow and the preaching of the KKK?

Protestant leaders in Northern Ireland —especially the DUP— must denounce this depraved bigotry. And I don’t want to hear those who say they are for the human rights of all in The North try to downplay and dismiss this odious hatred… no ‘buts’as if attacks on Catholicism is somehow not all that important. Anti-Catholicism, anti-Semitism, anti-Black racism and anti-Muslimism must all be condemned —no ‘buts.’”—Fr. Sean McManus.

Editor defends “Catholic Mass is evil” article by minister

The editor of an evangelical Protestant magazine has defended an article which describes Catholic Mass as “evil.”

Connla Young. The Irish News. Saturday, April 28, 2018

 

The article in the April-June edition of Ulster Bulwark was written by the Rev. Peter McIntyre of Clogher Valley Free Presbyterian Church.

The article, “The Protestant at the Mass.” focuses on the celebration of Requiem Mass and claims “there can be no greater assault on the Gospel.”

Mr. McIntyre says it is “impossible” for a Protestant to attend Catholic Mass as a  “neutral observer.”
Inline image
Free Presbyterian minister Peter McIntyre                

 Inline image

 Ulster Bulwark editor Wallace Thompson

 has defended  the article that describes the

 Mass as “evil.

 “A church is a place of worship,” he writes.“To be present is to be part of the worship, and as at any Mass, the wafer is translated into Christ, and this becomes the object of worship.

“Do we not owe it to Christ to be separate from such evils which grossly offend the Christ who offered himself for us?”

Mr. McIntyre says “many Protestants today, rather than sacrifice reputation, willingly expose themselves to the blasphemy of the Mass” and urges readers to “reaffirm our opposition to Rome.”

“Let us object to all that brings shame on the Gospel,” he said.

Ulster Bulwark is the official organ of the Evangelical Protestant Society.

Editor Wallace Thompson, a founding member of the DUP, was a special adviser to Nigel Dodds when Mr. Dodds was a Stormont minister.

Although Mr. Thompson is still a member of the DUP, he said he was not speaking on behalf of the party.

He said he does not believe the article could be viewed as sectarian.

“Roman Catholics who believe in the doctrine of the church will not agree with what was written in the article,” he said.

“Roman Catholic people do not agree with Protestant doctrine as well.

“I don’t think it’s sectarian. It’s being open and honest and saying this is what we believe.”

Mr. Thompson emphasized that the difference of opinion is rooted in doctrine.

“Yes, we disagree with the doctrinal position but bear no ill will to any Roman Catholic person or any other person,” he said.

Mr. Thompson said some Protestants do not understand the Bible.

“I would have more respect for my Roman Catholic fellow countrymen who hold to their beliefs than many Protestant fellow countrymen who have abandoned their beliefs,” he said.

Mr. Thompson, a formal civil servant, is clerk of session of Knock Evangelical Presbyterian Church and chairman of the Caleb Foundation.

In the past, the Evangelical Protestant Society criticised the then first minister Peter Robinson and other unionist politicians for attending the 2011 funeral of Catholic PSNI officer Ronan Kerr, who was murdered when a dissident republican bomb exploded under his car.

The society later wrote to all Protestant and unionist MLAs urging them “to take a firm stand” on attending Catholic church services and Sunday observance.

Founded in 1946, the society includes several members of the Orange Order and other loyal orders on its council.

According to its website the council’s only female member, Vi Dawson, who is the principal of a Co Antrim primary school, is also a regular contributor to ‘Thought for the Day’ on BBC Radio Ulster.

Mr. McIntyre did not respond to requests for a comment.



The Easter Rising’s Forgotten Battle

Posted by Jim on

The GPO, Mount Street Bridge, The South Dublin Union — these are names that resonate when it comes to Easter 1916 as the battlegrounds for what became Padraig Pearse’s ‘glorious failure.’ However, for some quirk of history, the success that took place in the sleepy town of Ashbourne, County Meath, during the Rising has been largely ignored by the general public.

On April 24, Easter Monday morning, Commandant Thomas Ashe (right) received orders from James Connolly to send 40 of his 5th Fingal Battalion to the General Post Office, in Dublin, to help fortify it. Also contained in his orders were instructions for Ashe to raid nearby barracks, thereby, hopefully, locking down Crown forces and relieving pressure on those fighting in the city.

Ashe sent 20 men to the rebels’ headquarters at the GPO and kept the remainder for the barracks attacks. It would prove to be a wise decision by the school teacher from Lusk.

He retained 60 men and seized the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC) barracks and the Post Office in Swords. They would have further success over the next few days, seizing barracks and Post Offices in the nearby villages of Donabate and Garristown.

The rebels then turned their sights on Ashbourne and planned to attack the RIC barracks there. That day, Ashe was joined by Richard Mulcahy, who had only recently been appointed to the rank of First Lieutenant. He was in the area following his own orders and happened to meet the Fingal commandant by chance. Ashe immediately made Mulcahy his second-in-command.

Before launching their assault, the rebels had made sure to cut telephone wires, and even sawed down telephone poles, to block off communications with the surrounding police district. Ashe also decided to send his older volunteers home, thus reducing his ranks to about 45 men. The attack at Ashbourne would prove to be tougher than the rebels had expected.

Usually, the barracks was manned by a sergeant and four constables, but it had been reinforced due to the fighting in the capital. Instead of five RIC for the rebels to contend with, there were now 10 policemen, led by a District Inspector McCormack, all well-armed and well-prepared.

The rebels had an early boost when they managed to disarm two RIC men who were setting up a barricade outside the barracks. Ashe then called on the remaining officers to surrender. Instead, the RIC showed the rebels the business end of their guns, and soon heavy fire was being exchanged.

The rebels were making little headway until a homemade hand grenade was lobbed at the station. This soon settled things and the RIC inside waved a flag of surrender.

However, just as the constables were about to emerge, the rebels were alerted to the imminent arrival of a large RIC convoy, under County Inspector Alexander Gray, on its way to put the down the rising. With the prospect of rescue from the convoy, the besieged policemen returned to their posts and resumed the fight.

Seventeen cars carrying approximately 60 RIC officers from Slane were, at that moment, speeding toward the rebels. Ashe and his men were in a race against time, and had to rush toward the road to stop the convoy reaching the crossroad at Rath Cross, where the RIC could then spread out. It was at this point that second-in-command Richard Mulcahy (right) came into his own.

The narrow Dublin to Slane road, with its tall, close hedges – about seven-feet-high – on either side, provided perfect terrain for the rebels. Mulcahy had his men positioned on both sides of the road as the convoy approached at a few minutes past noon. Just before Rath Cross, the road rose at Hammandstown.

It was just as the convoy crested this hill, 15 yards from the crossroads, that the rebels launched a devastating attack on the Crown forces, with the RIC taking heavy fire from all quarters. First to be hit was County Inspector Gray, in the lead car.

The Irish Independent newspaper reported some of the ensuing events: ‘County Inspector Gray received a wound to the head, and Sgt Shanaher, of Navan, who was with him in the car, was shot through the heart. ‘The Sergeant fell into a channel of water near the cross, and presented a gruesome spectacle when the battle ended. He was thrown into the channel in a sitting position and was found dead, still wearing his helmet.’

The rest of the convoy then jumped from their vehicles, seeking cover behind the wheels or beneath the cars themselves. Others leapt into a ditch and started firing on their attackers from there. The fighting was fierce.

A civilian car that blundered into the ambush was also fired on, resulting in the deaths of two of the occupants. For five hours lead flew in all directions.

The rebels were closing in. The convoy’s new commander, District Inspector Harry Smyth, managed to kill one volunteer with his pistol only to be shot dead himself a moment later, his brains spattered across the ditch into which he fell. With the loss of their leader, the police signaled their surrender.

At the end of the carnage, eight policemen lay dead in ditches and along the road, and up to 18 were wounded. The rebels suffered two dead – John Crennigan and Thomas Rafferty – and five wounded.

The besieged officers in Ashbourne barracks soon gave up the fight when they were informed that the rescue party had been defeated. Ashe and Mulcahy had the injured, including the RIC, ferried to the Meath Infirmary, in Navan.

Singing in chorus and cheering for the Irish Republic, Ashe’s men marched off and camped at Kilsallaghan, near Dublin, where they remained until they received orders to surrender on Saturday.

The statistics speak for themselves – four barracks raided, eight RIC killed, 18 wounded, up to 80 policemen captured in total; all this with the loss of two dead and five wounded on the rebel side.

If a lesson in guerrilla warfare was ever needed, all any future rebels had to do was to compare the results from the fighting in Dublin to that of the men led by Thomas Ashe and Richard Mulcahy in Ashbourne.

Thomas Ashe would have his death sentence commuted for his part in the Rising, but he would die nonetheless a year later in Mountjoy Prison, while being force fed when he was on hunger strike. Richard Mulcahy would go on to have a stellar career as Chief of Staff of the Irish Volunteers, Commander in Chief of the Free State Army, and Minister for Defence in the Civil War, as well as holding other ministries in the years following.

Paul O’Brien’s book Field of Fire – The Battle of Ashbourne, 1916 offers an intense look at those four hours of combat. I showed it to an old friend of mine, Charlie Weston, who lives in the area where the fighting occurred. It turns out that his grandfather, also named Charlie Weston, was one of the section leaders during the attack.

My friend spoke with real pride for what his grandfather had achieved on that day.

The Battle of Ashbourne was important because it showed that Crown forces could be comprehensively defeated if the right tactics were chosen.

Never again would Volunteers make prisoners of themselves by occupying buildings that could then be surrounded by the British military. Instead, the use of ambushes and guerrilla tactics would be critical to the success that would follow in the War of Independence.

The brave men at Ashbourne paved the way for that kind of warfare – the only kind that could possibly defeat the might of the British Empire. It’s just a pity their courage and fighting prowess is not as widely acknowledged today as it undoubtedly should.

Inquest brings closure to family of Marian Brown

Posted by Jim on

 

A seventeen-year-old girl was pointlessly shot dead by a British soldier
while she hugged her boyfriend, a coroner has confirmed.

Marian Brown was killed on June 10 1972 near a British Army checkpoint
in Roden Street in southwest Belfast.

She did not pose a threat to anybody, Judge David McFarland said, but he
accepted claims by British soldiers that they “acted in self-defence”
due to previous shooting in the area.

Thomas Corrigan was badly injured as he and his first love were caught
in the crossfire.

He said: “I am pleased that the truth has finally come out. It makes a
difference but it won’t bring back Marian. It won’t bring back the child
that we lost and of course it still creates problems for me and Marian’s
family.”

The coroner was unable to identify the soldier who fired the fatal
bullet as he delivered his preliminary ruling in Belfast.

He said: “Neither Marian Brown nor anyone at her locality was acting in
a manner that could reasonably or honestly have been perceived as posing
a threat of death or injury… the force used by that soldier by firing
in the direction of Marian Brown was not justified as it was more than
was absolutely necessary.”

There was an “inadequate” investigation afterwards, the coroner added.

Mr Corrigan was walking with Miss Brown and her sister. She was going
from her home at Stanhope Drive in Belfast to her sister’s house, they
were parting ways and sharing a last hug when he heard loud firing
erupt.

After the inquest he said: “She was a beautiful girl really, not even a
woman, and yes she was pregnant with our child. To lose her was a
massive part of my life.”

Miss Brown’s brother Richard Brown said he was sorry it had taken 46
years to prove something the family knew from day one.

“She was just a happy-go-lucky kid – she never got a chance.”