‘The Bold McElwain’ remembered

Posted by Jim on April 29, 2017

Monaghan Republican and Ex-POW John Crawley delivered a graveside
oration at a commemoration for Seamus McElwain in Scotstown recently.

Unlike many here today I didn’t have the privilege of knowing Seamus
McElwain personally. I found out only in the last fortnight that he and
I were members of the same Colour Party in 1980 but with all the
activity on the day I don’t believe we had the opportunity to speak to
each other. I do recall the first time I heard tell of Seamus. I was in
a house at another part of the Border and a Volunteer from this end of
the country told me about a young lad who showed particular promise and
was shaping up to be an outstanding IRA Volunteer. I looked forward to
meeting him but between prison sentences and one thing or another I kept
missing him.

I was in Portlaoise prison in April 1986, serving the first of three
sentences when news came through that Seamus had been killed in action.
Jim Lynagh had been released from Portlaoise prison only a week
previously. Little did Jim know that he would shortly be attending the
funeral of his friend and comrade Seamus McElwain or that his own
funeral lay so close ahead, just over a year later, along with seven of
his comrades killed at Loughgall. That was the dangerous world IRA
Volunteers inhabited in 1986 when Seamus lost his life.

Few of us knew then what was ahead of us but all of us knew what we were
fighting for and let nobody tell you different. We were on precisely the
same mission as the men and women of 1916 – to put an end to British
Crown sovereignty in Ireland and to establish a 32-county republican
government of national unity based upon democracy and social justice. To
that end we were prepared to engage in both military and political
activity.

Militarily Seamus was a legend. A highly motivated, courageous and
inspiring Volunteer, he placed himself continually at the tip of the
spear, at the cutting edge of resistance, leading from the front,
leading by example. In any conventional army Seamus would have been a
highly decorated soldier, recognised and acclaimed for his audacity and
gallantry. But in the secretive and perilous existence of an IRA
Volunteer, involved in a guerrilla campaign against such overwhelming
odds, his exploits would, for the most part, and of necessity, remain
known only to a select few. Such courage and commitment cannot, however,
be kept completely secret in all its aspects and his reputation grew and
spread among his comrades in the IRA and among the many supporters of
the republican struggle who, at great sacrifice and personal risk,
opened their homes to Seamus and his comrades.

In addition to his military activities Seamus was also active
politically. His father James was a member of Monaghan County Council
for 20 years and Seamus himself had run in a 26-county general election
in 1982, while on remand in Crumlin Road prison, receiving an impressive
vote.

In 1986, political activity was encouraged by most thinking Volunteers.
The IRA campaign could not be allowed to become a spectator sport, with
a small number of Volunteers taking all the risks to life, limb and
liberty. We needed to make ourselves relevant to people’s lives and
build alliances both foreign and domestic. A larger portion of the
populace had to become involved in the republican struggle, had to be
educated in the necessity of Irish Unity and independence and had to
become an integral and engaged part of what we believed would be the
final stage in Ireland’s long War of Independence.

Make no mistake that when Seamus was killed in 1986 republican politics,
for the Active Service Units in the field and for the captured
Volunteers in the prisons, was about furthering the aims, ideals and
objectives of the 1916 Proclamation. Political opportunism and careerism
was, in our view, strictly reserved for Castle Catholics and
partitionist poltroons.

The British government, for their part, took us on militarily and
politically. When you take on the Brits you are taking on a lot, utterly
ruthless they are world-renowned experts in counter-insurgency.
According to one British historian, of 196 countries in the world today
the British have invaded or established a military presence in 171 of
them. So it is not surprising that they have evolved a multi-layered and
coordinated approach to achieving British strategic objectives through
the focused use of applied violence and the manipulation and co-option
of indigenous leaderships, groups and movements.

Militarily they used their informer directed SAS ambush teams to kill
IRA Volunteers in direct combat. Behind the scenes they used Loyalist
death squads, armed and directed by RUC Special Branch and British
Military Intelligence, to murder republicans, their supporters and
totally innocent Catholics whenever they judged it opportune to do so.
Their agents bombed Dublin and Monaghan and carried out a host of other
black operations, North and South and overseas. They killed who they
could, they jailed who they could and they bought who they could.

In parallel with their military efforts the British had a political
strategy. They outlined this very clearly in a discussion paper produced
after the so-called Darlington Conference in September 1972. In this
paper the British government published what it called ‘some unalterable
facts about the situation’ and ‘some fundamental conditions… which any
settlement must meet’.

These included UK parliamentary sovereignty over all persons, matters
and things within the Six Counties, All-Ireland endorsement of the
Unionist Veto, the need for a reformed Stormont giving Nationalists a
share in the exercise of executive power, public confidence in, and
collaboration with, the locally-recruited British constabulary, and the
need for Dublin government buy-in to the new arrangements, with a
special focus on the removal of Articles 2 and 3 of the Irish
Constitution and increased security collaboration with the 26-county
state.

In a separate strategy, the Brits also hoped to lure republicans into
protracted and ambiguous negotiations, in order to gain intelligence and
gradually ensnare them into a habit of interfacing with agents and
agencies of the UK government as part of a British state legitimation
process. Softly, softly catchy monkey.

So British policy, from the very beginning of the Troubles, was to
dismantle the Orange state and replace it with a viable political entity
which would preserve the political and territorial integrity of the
United Kingdom. To do this the British needed to defeat or neutralise
the IRA and bring the vast bulk of nationalists on board as stakeholders
in a reformed Stormont. As their strategy evolved, they realised they
needed to do more to convince unionists that these moves did not flag up
any disengagement from Ireland. The Downing Street Declaration of 1993,
which outlined British preconditions for a settlement, refers to the
Unionist Veto eight times in its twelve points.

The British can be quite practical. If you oppose the British state in
what they consider the wrong way they may imprison or kill you. But the
British will pay you a salary and expenses to oppose them if you agree
to become bound by their terms and conditions. When British Prime
Minister Tony Blair announced the train was leaving the station and any
party not on it would be left behind he didn’t mean the freedom train to
a United Ireland but the gravy train to Stormont.

A constant battle was fought between republicans who wanted politics to
be about revolutionary advancement and British counter-insurgency
strategists who were trying, through the judicious use of bribery and
butchery, to nurture a loyal nationalist opposition and an insurgent
leadership fit for purpose.

What was that purpose? To shape the strategic environment in a way that
allowed Britain to define the nature of the conflict, shape the
parameters of Irish democracy and determine the boundaries within which
Irish opposition to British rule must operate. For Republicans,
democracy in Ireland is the expression of a united and free people,
fully informed and without outside interference or impediment. For the
British, democracy in Ireland is any mechanistic exhibition of electoral
theatre which, despite the use or threat of force, bribery, censorship,
partition, gerrymander or sectarian interventions, achieves a desired
result.

At present there is no mechanism to advance Irish Unity that isn’t
comprehensively ringfenced by British constitutional constraints. A
glaring example is the proposed six-county Border Poll under Britain’s
Northern Ireland Act 1998, which permits the Secretary of State
(presently an English politician without a single vote in Ireland) to
determine if and when a poll may be called, the wording of the poll and
who qualifies to vote. Even if passed, the British parliament retains
the final say on whether or not the result will be endorsed by the UK
government.

The British have a remarkable capacity for channelling Irish political
trajectories in a particular direction, harnessing Irish leaderships to
drive the strategy and then making the Irish believe it was their own
idea. James Connolly called it ‘ruling by fooling’.

A core concept of Irish republicanism is that Irish constitutional
authority derives exclusively from the Irish people and does not defer
to laws or decrees emanating from England. The signatories to The
Proclamation believed that in April 1916, every republican believed that
in April 1986 and, despite all the inducements to do otherwise, many of
us believe it still.

We are told by the political establishment north and south that the 1998
Good Friday Agreement represents the democratic will of the Irish
people. We were once told that the achievement of Home Rule represented
the democratic will of the Irish people. Then we were told that the 1918
General Election was the democratic will of the Irish people. Then the
1921 Anglo-Irish Treaty was the democratic will, except this time the
only democratic will that mattered was that of the Irish people in the
26-Counties. And so it goes ad nauseum.

A Fine Gael TD and former Dublin government minister claimed that the
results of the 1998 referenda on the Good Friday Agreement were, ‘the
purest form of self-determination ever given by the Irish people’. Yet
in 2000 and again in 2002 British Colonial Secretaries, who between them
had never received as much as a single vote in the whole of Ireland,
were able to scrap the Good Friday institutions and reinstate British
direct rule. So much for the democratic will of the Irish people,
dismissed with the stroke of an English pen. Under the principle of UK
parliamentary sovereignty the British government can do this at any time
it chooses without reference to a single member of the Irish electorate.
The Brits are able to do this because in Stormont Irishmen and women
hold office but England holds power.

We are often advised we must not dissent from a political process which
bestows upon Britain democratic title in Ireland because it could
undermine the peace. Liam Mellows TD said during the Treaty Debates in
1921, ‘if peace was the only object why, I say, was this fight ever
started? Why did we ever negotiate for what we are now told is
impossible? Why should men have ever been led on the road they travelled
if peace was the only object? We could have had peace, and could have
been peaceful in Ireland a long time ago if we were prepared to give up
the ideal for which we fought.’ Liam Mellows was later executed by the
Free State government for defending the Republic and resisting British
attempts to impose a treaty which partitioned Ireland and re-defined
Irish democracy in British Imperial interests.

Being an authentic and active republican has often been a serious and
dangerous business. We know from Irish history what a soft bed can be
made from a tissue of lies. There have always been those who service the
lie at great personal profit and those who act on the truth at great
personal cost.

Seamus McElwain died acting on the truth. The same truth spoken by James
Connolly at his court martial 100 years ago when he said, ‘we went out
to break the connection between this country and the British Empire, and
to establish an Irish Republic… Believing that the British Government
has no right in Ireland, never had any right in Ireland, and never can
have any right in Ireland, the presence, in any one generation of
Irishmen, of even a respectable minority, ready to die to affirm that
truth, makes that Government for ever a usurpation and a crime against
human progress.’

Breaking the British connection was what the struggle for Irish freedom
was about in 1916. That is what the struggle for Irish freedom was about
in 1986, when Seamus died for it, and that is what the struggle for
freedom is about now. In the words of Padraig Pearse, ‘we know only one
definition of freedom: it is Tone’s definition, it is Mitchel’s
definition, it is Rossa’s definition. Let no man blaspheme the cause
that the dead generations of Ireland served by giving it any other name
and definition than their name and their definition.’ Although some
former comrades now call on us to respect the British connection as a
gesture to Irish Unionism, breaking that connection and establishing a
united national citizenship free from Britain is the historic mission of
Irish republicanism.

Seamus McElwain was a good republican, a good soldier and a good man.
His death at the hands of the British army of occupation near Roslea,
Co. Fermanagh on the 26th of April 1986 was an incalculable loss to his
family, his friends and his comrades. His life is remembered by them
with love and pride. To those who did not know Seamus personally, or
were not even born when he was killed on Active Service, his truth,
courage, honour and commitment are an inspiration and an ideal to be
aspired to. Fuair se bhas ar son Saoirse na hEireann.

Monaghan Republicans, in conjunction with the McElwain family, are
holding an Independent 30th Anniversary Commemoration to Vol. Seamus
McElwain at the Monument in Knockatallon, Saturday 23rd April at 2pm.
All welcome.