subscribe to the RSS Feed

Saturday, November 14, 2026

Thatcher’s fears over Sinn Fein publicity

Posted by Jim on August 3, 2013

Secret British documents from 1983 show the high level of concern in

London at the rise of Sinn Fein, and advanced plans to limit media

opportunities for the party.

 

A number of documents were released by the British government from their

archives this week.

One reveals how, prior to the Westminster general election in June 1983,

British prime minister Margaret Thatcher moved to prevent the party

gaining publicity.

 

She was advised in a letter that exclusion orders against Sinn Fein

election candidates, Gerry Adams, Martin McGuinness and Daniel Morrison,

would have to be revoked if any of them were elected to the Westminster

Parliament.

 

The orders preventing the three entering Britain from the North of

Ireland had been in place since 8 December 1982.

 

Guessing Adams would be the likely winner in west Belfast, the letter

suggested “it will be best to revoke the order immediately the result is

known” to prevent a wave of publicity over a British MP’s exclusion from

Britain

 

In a handwritten note on the top of the letter, Thatcher agreed to the

Home Office suggestion.

 

She wrote: “If these people are elected. I believe we have to revoke the

order. But I don’t know that I am inclined to do it now. By the time the

Northern Ireland count takes place we should have some idea of how

things are going here. It may be necessary to consult as you suggest.”

 

There was also concern in British government circles in November 1982,

after Gerry Adams did an interview with the BBC’s Panorama programme.

 

A telegram dated 24 November 1982 and labelled ‘Restricted’ expressed

concerned that the Irish Times commented on “the superb mileage which

Gerry Adams got when he danced around Fred Emery [BBC reporter] and

secured what must be the most impressive piece of television exposure he

or the political wing of the PIRA have ever had unquote”.

 

The confidential telegram said: “Several other people here have

commented that Emery was simply not briefed for the task and the

programme will have done damage both in Northern Ireland and the

Republic. For these reasons, I think that the cassette should be used

sparingly if at all in non-official circles.”

 

ESCAPED

 

Fears of a republican publicity breakthrough also dominated Thatcher’s

response to the 1983 escape of 38 IRA prisoners of war from the H-Blocks

of Long Kesh.

 

She declared it was “even worse than we thought” across the top of a

document urging a propaganda counter-effort.

 

The strongly-worded advice sent by telegram from the Foreign and

Commonwealth Office to its embassies and colonies stated: “You should

take every opportunity to limit the propaganda benefit the IRA will reap

from the outbreak… the Government regard the outbreak most seriously.”

 

And later in the year, Thatcher considered banning Sinn Fein entirely,

despite fears that a proscribed Sinn Fein could re-emerge under another

name, and that banning the party could produce mass defiance and

widespread civil disobedience.

 

Files from 22 December 1983 show that the British Cabinet took no action

on that matter — but opted instead to look again at selective

internment.

Anniversary of Internment 2013

Posted by Jim on

 By Ardoyne Republican

 

 Internment or Detention Without Trial is nothing new to Irish people and

has been used every few decades throughout our Nation’s occupation.

Whenever Westminster chose to imprison and/or exile entire communities

throughout the country. The Twentieth Century witnessed a number of

phases of Internment in attempts to quell resistance to British Rule

beginning after the 1916 Rising and ending in 1975. Internment conjurs

up a collective legacy of a denial of justice, violence and brutality

inflicted upon fellow citizens and communities. And so it was again on

August 9th 1971, when hundreds of Republicans, Nationalists and

Socialists were brutally dragged from their beds in dawn swoops by

heavily-armed British soldiers and thrown into armoured vehicles and

driven away to the cries of the mothers, wives and children.

 

In Ardoyne alone, riots took place across the district as news of mass

arrests spread from home to home. The Provisional & Official sections of

the IRA in the area mounted a number of military operations to keep the

troops out. Gun battles between Republicans & the British were

commonplace throughout the day and the Woodvale Defence Association

(WDA), forerunner of the UDA used Internment to force Catholic families

from a dozens of homes in the Woodvale, Glenbryn and Ballysillan areas.

They also wrecked and burnt hundreds of other homes that Protestants

lived in Cranbrook, Farringdon Gardens and Velsheda to ensure Catholic

families could not move into them. The British Army also went on the

rampage in and around Ardoyne killing a Protestant householder, Sarah

Worthington in Velsheda, claiming she had a rifle? To date, no member of

the British Crown Forces has been made accountable for her murder. They

were also firing wrecklessly into Etna Drive and Jamaica Street for

hours from Glenbryn, until the IRA returned fire. During the ensuing

battle, dedicated Volunteer, Paddy McAdorey was killed defending his

community.

 

Internment had a massive impact on Nationalist Belfast and communities

including Ardoyne responded in the only way they knew how, with riots,

burnings and trouble. Political representation in the Six Counties

during the Seventies was pretty grim and the SDLP, encouraged a general

boycott of the Unionist and British Authorities. Although, they later,

failing the electorate by embracing the system and helped criminalise

those who supported the Civil Disobeience campaign. Over the next five

years, many who believed in human rights campaigned for the prisoners,

took to the streets, protested, refused to pay rent for council houses

and marched. The British criminalised entire communities due to their

support for the Internees to the extent that they gunned-down 14

marchers in Derry during an Anti-Internment Rally on January 31st, 1972.

Branding them gunmen and bombers, a final act of injustice.

 

Throughout the remainder of the Seventies, most potential voters

continued distrusting Political Parties and felt the only way to be

heard was through violence. As such, young people in Ardoyne and other

Nationalist areas marked the anniversary of Internment with Bonfires

that always resulted in riots between youths and British Troops.

Throughout the summer months, young people collected and gathered wood

for a number of bonfires to be lit at Midnight on August 9. After the

1980 & 1981 Hunger-Strikes, both the Provisional IRA and INLA used riots

as opportunities to cunduct operations against the British and RUC. A

deadly mix of emotions that almost always left many within the district,

shot and wounded by live rounds, Plastic Bullets and heavy batons. In

one such riot, the RUC shot and killed young Bone resident, Seamus Duffy

(15) in Dawson Street, off the New Lodge Road on August 8th, 1989.

 

On the afternoon of August 8th 1988, a few comrades and I had been

standing in the garden of 100 Brompton Park, the Sinn Fein Centre in

Ardoyne. Enjoying the summer’s weather, when we noticed a car slowing

down and a man in the back looking suspiciously at us as it sped away. A

short distance away, a lorry had just delivered drinks to the Highfield

Social Club and was leaving for it’s next job. A number of local youths

standing outside Whelan’s Shop in Etna Drive, were sharing a yarn. When

a UVF man alighted from the sunroof of the car armed with an automatic

rifle and directed his fire at them. As they dived for cover, eighteen

year-old, Seamus Morris from Highbury Gardens. His younger brother,

Conor and a friend luckily survived. As chaos reigned, the car attempted

to make good it’s escape but found it’s way blocked by the same lorry

and was forced to mount the footpath. The lorry driver and his helper

had courageously decided to ram the getaway car. As it drove up the

kerb, the gunman again opened fire into the cab of the lorry and killed

it’s passenger, Peter Dolan (32) from West Belfast.

 

I didn’t know Seamus well, we attended different Schools. However, he

was a very nice person and never passed you by without a hello. He was

known locally as a quiet fella, very intelligent and had worked in the

Civil Service. As with nearly everyone killed from the locality by

Loyalists, Seamus had absolutly no connection to Republicanism and was

clearly a victim of a random sectarian shooting. The two murders were

eventually admitted by the Protesstant Action Force (PAF), a cover-name

for the UVF. The death of Seamus had a devastating impact on his family

and his Mother contracted cancer soon afterwards and died four years

later. His Dad never recovered and couldn’t even speak about his son.

Therefore, I’m proud to announce on this Blog that on his and Peter’s

25th anniversary a Plague will be unveiled outside Whelan’s Shop on

August Sunday 11th, August at 1pm. The details of which I publish below.

I would encourage everyone to please attend and show solidarity with

both families.

 

In another event to mark Internment, the Anti-Internment League has

organised a large march which will leave Ardoyne Avenue at 6pm on Friday

9th, August. The parade will proceed down the Oldpark Road, Rosepenna

Street, Cliftonville Road, Antrim Road, New Lodge Road, North Queen

Street, Donegall Street, Royal Avenue, up Castle Street onto Divis

Street where it will meet other marchers and bands. The march will then

proceed up the Falls Road, Anderstown Road and into the Busy Bee, where

a Rally will be held to recall those incarcerated between 1971 and 1975.

It will also focus on Political Prisoners currently held behind bars

like Martin Corey and others Interned by Remand. Where POWs’ can be held

up to 3 years before trial. The march has been endorsed by a number of

Republican Political Groups, such as the Irish Republican Socialist

Party (IRSP), Republican Network for Unity (RNU), Eirigi, the 1916

Societies and the 32 County Sovereignty Movement. Once again, I would

ask anyone with an interest in Human Rights to please attend the above

march and demonstrate your opposition to Internment.

 

Lobbyist angered by Irish government’s inaction over US immigration reform

Posted by Jim on July 30, 2013

Ciaran Staunton says government is more concerned with diplomacy than seeking change for the Irish in America
By IrishCentral Staff Writers,

Ciaran Staunton, the president of the Irish Lobby for Immigration Reform (ILIR), has said the inaction of the Irish government’s Department of Foreign Affairs, with relation to US immigration reform, has left his group feeling “isolated”.

Speaking to Cork’s Irish Examiner, Staunton said the Irish Government is old-fashioned in its approach. He also told them the government is more concerned with diplomacy than with making a real change for the Irish undocumented in the United States.

He said, “When it comes to the politics of Washington most people are using the iPhone. But the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Irish Embassy are still using the rotary dial-up.

“The policies have never changed. What happens when you have the permanent government situation, the script is the same.

“We can only advise them. We’re Irish-American and they’re a foreign government but ultimately they can open doors.”

Despite the lack of support from across the pond Staunton continued to push the message from Irish-America (that they want immigration reform for the undocumented Irish) throughout the United States.

Staunton also spoke about Senator Edward Kennedy’s Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 which made it more difficult for the Irish to obtain a working visa in the United States. As Kennedy himself pointed out the Act was discriminatory.

The ILIR head said the Irish government has never addressed the fact that the Irish are being discriminated by their current lack of visa options.

He said, “Official Ireland has been very reluctant — I don’t think they’ve ever addressed the 1965 Act. The department [Foreign Affairs] have been the weak link. There’s a mentality of ‘let’s not talk about it, let’s not ask’. One of the things in Washington is that you always have to be looking, you always have to be pushing.”

The Irish Government has defended its role. They have funded the immigration reform lobby $430,366 (€324,637) since 2006.

During Eamon Gilmore, Ireland’s Deputy leader’s, visit to Washington DC he said the Irish Government has been addressing this issue since 2006

Sectarian attacks condemned

Posted by Jim on July 28, 2013

An IRA memorial in County Fermanagh was spray-painted in the latest in a  series of sectarian attacks in the north of Ireland.    The number of sectarian incidents in the North saw a substantial  increase during the Protestant marching season, reaching a climax after  the Orange Order’s ‘Twelfth’ (of July) marches in honour of the  Protestant victory at the Battle of the Boyne over a Catholic army.    The IRA memorial commemorates two IRA men, Sean South and Fergal  O’Hanlon, who were killed on an attack on Brookeborough barracks in  1957.    The memorial was spray-painted red, white and blue in the shape of a  Union Jack, as well as red paint sprayed over two adjoining statues.    The large stone memorial, at Altawark crossroads, has been targeted a  number of times in the past by vandals.    Local Sinn Fein councillor Brian McCaffrey urged more unionists to  condemn the attack saying they need to “step-up” and defuse rising  tensions.    CONDEMNATION URGED    Dubbing it a “pointless attack”, Councillor McCaffrey said the loyalists  responsible offered nothing for the community.    “The time has come for local unionist politicians to step up to the  plate. They must loudly and openly condemn and disassociate themselves  from this type of action,” he said.    “This is a pointless attack which will only serve to further raise  tensions.    “It also has the side effect of exposing the bankruptcy of hard-line  loyalism. It is clear that this is all they have to offer the community.    “If they fail to do so their lurking in the shadows will be seen as  tacit approval.    “The fact is that these vandals are not coming from 100 mile away, they  come from within the community.    “I would appeal for people not to retaliate but I can’t guarantee that  they won’t do so.    “None of this serves a purpose, it has a danger of cranking tensions  especially around the marching season.    “I have lost count as to how many times that monument has been attacked,  it’s well into the double figures.”    Local republicans are said to be considering an investment in CCTV  cameras to prevent further attacks from happening.  The cost of  repairing previous attacks has reached thousands of pounds, they said.    In response, one local unionist councillor Paul Robinson later told a  local newspaper that the attacks “shouldn’t happen”. The DUP man said he  believes “it’s all coming from the flag issue [protests over flags at  Belfast city hall] but that shouldn’t come into it. These attacks don’t  help the situation nor does it gain anything.”    HALLS ATTACKED    Meanwhile, Senior Sinn Fein members today [Friday] met with the  Apprentice Boys in Derry after paint appeared on their memorial hall in  the city this week.    “We are all absolutely disgusted at this attack,” Sinn Fein’s Raymond  McCartney said.    “We’ve all seen in recent weeks and recent months the great steps taken  in this city and the memorial hall and the Apprentice Boys have all been  part of that story.”    The paint appeared ahead of the Apprentice Boys’ main sectarian parade  of the year, the ‘Relief of Derry’, commemorating a 17th century  Protestant battle victory over the forces of the Catholic King James. It  was said to be the third attack on the hall in recent weeks.    Sinn Fein Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness, who this week  condemned the Orange Order for continuing to attempt to hold banned  parades in nationalist north Belfast, differentiated the two orders.    He said the Apprentice Boys “play a positive role in the life of Derry”.  And in an unusual post to his Twitter internet page, he said the recent  “shameful attacks” on the Apprentice Boys’ memorial hall should be  condemned.    Halls owned by the Orange Order have also been afflicted by paint  attacks recently, with green and yellow paint appearing on the walls of  one hall in the overwhelmingly nationalist town of Bellaghy, County  Derry last Saturday morning.    Ulster Unionist representative Sandra Overend described that incident as  “a disgusting attack on the Orange culture”.    She said it was the second paint attack on Bellaghy Orange hall in less  than a week.    “I have spoken to members of the Orange in Bellaghy and they have again  insisted that they will rise above such provocation and not let it deter  them from their beliefs. I commend them.”    In other incidents, a video showing a man scaling a flagpole and  removing a British Union Jack flag outside a west Belfast Orange hall is  being investigated by the PSNI who described the incident as ‘theft’.    The PSNI also removed an Irish flag from the grounds of a disused PSNI  police base in Dungiven, County Derry this week, without explanation.

Deputy Irish PM Eamon Gilmore in U.S. to lobby House members over immigration reform

Posted by Jim on July 22, 2013

Pundits agree that the House will be a tougher fight than the Senate

By

BREANDÁN G. MAGEE ,
IrishCentral Contributing Writer

 

The Tánaiste and Foreign Minister Eamon Gilmore arrived in Washington D.C. on Thursday July 11th, the day after House Republicans emerged from a closed-door meeting to determine their response to the passage of S744, the comprehensive immigration reform bill that passed the Senate two weeks ago. 

The bill passed by a comfortable 68 to 32 majority after the addition of the Hoeven-Corker amendment, which among other things increases spending and enforcement on the border, a move seen as crucial in securing the 14 Republican votes garnered by the bill.  The focus now lies squarely on the House of Representatives where members are still scrambling to respond to the Senate proposal.

Unlike the Senate the House is controlled by Republicans who command a 224 member majority in the 435 member chamber and any would-be bill must not only secure 218 votes to pass but must also jump over a Republican internal hurdle known as the Hastert Rule.  While not constitutionally mandated the Republican Party abides by its own rule that dictates that no bill will even be brought to the floor for a vote if ‘a majority of the majority’ does not support it.  In other words Speaker Boehner will kill any bill if it does not have the support of the Republicans as a whole.  In this context all eyes are on Republicans as they grapple among their own rank and file with how to respond to the Senate’s sweeping immigration bill. 

As yet there has been no clear or demonstrable strategy outlined by Republicans, except to say that they firmly reject the proposal that has come out of the Senate and that they plan to produce their own bill or bills.  Nothing operates in a vacuum and immigration reform is being played out in the context of Republican internal politics.  Despite a strong coalition of Bibles, Badges and Business (churches, law enforcement and chambers of commerce) calling for immigration reform some Republicans are arguing that it is just not an issue for constituents in their home districts and as such they do not see the need to rush to a vote

Even this has its context when one examines the gerrymandered electoral boundaries of the 435 Congressional Districts.  Of those 435 seats only 28 are seen as a toss-up between Republicans and Democrats; in other words lines have been drawn so well on the map that most Republicans are in safe districts and worry more about a right wing contender from their own party in a primary run off than they do a Democratic opponent at a general election.  Those in the Tea Party right wing of the Republican Party are loathe to any mention of immigration reform, which they see as amnesty for people who broke the law by coming here illegally.

However the party leadership knows only too well that their national aspirations and chances of retaking the White House depend on passing immigration reform and appealing more to the growing Hispanic electorate.  ‘Elections have consequences’ is an oft heard phrase since the November presidential election, which swept President Obama to a second term on the backs of a growing Latino electorate.  Latinos jumped from 5 to 11% of the voting public and fell 70 to 30 in favor of Obama.  Republicans were widely viewed as being anti-immigrant in that election with their calls for the self-deportation o f the 11 million undocumented.

Given the nature of the electoral college system that elects a new president and understanding that most elections are decided by key swing states (where Latinos are a growing voting block) and not the popular national vote, you can see why Republicans are concerned.  The big question then is whether the Party responds to local politics or plays a bigger game.

Amid this cliffhanger the Tánasite travelled to Washington to meet with leaders in the Republican Party notably Congressman Paul Ryan, Peter King, Bob Goodlatte (Chairman of the Judiciary Committee), Kevin McCarthy, and Senator John McCain.  He also met with Speaker Boehner’s Chief of Staff.  He was in town to stress the importance of immigration reform with a pathway to citizenship for the undocumented and the Irish E3 Visa. 

He took time to meet Billy Lawless Chairman of the Chicago Celts for Immigration Reform as well as Dan Dennehy from the AOH, Celine Kennelly from the Irish Lobby for Immigration Reform and Republican strategist Manus Cooney.

Another stop was made to long time friend to the Irish and lion of the Senate Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) who spearheaded the Irish E3 along with Senator Schumer (D-NY).  It is safe to say that much work needs to be done to educate the House Republicans that this is not just a Latino issue but signs are there that they are ready to move on legislation.

As those meetings took place in DC the leadership of the Republican Party in Illinois met in Chicago with Congressman Gutierrez (D-IL), a long time proponent of immigration reform and author of his own immigration House bill, yet to be released.  Minority Leader Tom Cross (R) Senator Christine Radogno (R) and potential gubernatorial candidate Representative Kirk Dillard listened as Cyril Regan of Chicago Irish Immigrant Support argued that immigration reform affects many different communities including the Irish.  Dillard, himself from a district that is home to many Polish immigrants, acknowledged the need to educate Republicans on the issue and posited that Republican ‘yes’ votes in the House were ‘gettable’.

Pundits agree that the House will be a tougher fight than the Senate to secure a bill and Republicans may insist on passing several piecemeal pieces of legislation that deal with border security and the undocumented rather than a sweeping comprehensive bill but momentum is certainly on the side of pro reform advocates.  Unlike the last attempt to pass the Kennedy Mc Cain immigration bill of 2006, immigration reform boasts a much broader coalition of supporters and critically it has the support of most of the Republican leadership with their eye on the White House in 2016.  The upcoming Congressional mid terms in 2014 will also have a role to play in rushing this through the legislative process by the Fall, as no one on either side of the aisle wants such a divisive and politically hot potato to mar the elections. 

The Irish will have their part to play in how this pans out come September after the Congress returns from its month long August summer recess. Irish groups are already mobilizing across the country in their home districts to educate Republicans on the issue and bring to light the fact that 50,000 Irish undocumented workers are affected. Time will tell if that gift of the gab for which we are famous can get the message across.

*Breandán G. Magee is the Executive Director Chicago Irish Immigrant Support