Posted by Jim on May 21, 2016
Loyalists have said they will not seek permission to oppose the annual
anti-internment march, which will take place on Sunday, August 7. The
move could spark a confrontation as up to 5,000 people and at least four
bands are expected to take part in the march.
The parade has been organised to mark the 45th anniversary of the
introduction of internment in 1971, which saw hundreds of nationalists
jailed without charge.
The parade is also intended to highlight the ongoing process by which
republicans are being interned ‘by remand’, held on trumped-up charges
without trial.
In 2013 there was serious violence on Royal Avenue – Belfast’s busiest
shopping street – after loyalists opposed to the parade clashed with the
PSNI. Last August’s anti-internment march was stopped by the PSNI near
Ardoyne in north Belfast as hundreds of loyalists gathered in the city
centre for a major protest.
However, parade organisers say this year’s march will leave
Andersonstown in west Belfast before moving down Castle Street and onto
Donegall Place at its junction with Royal Avenue. The procession will
then make its way to Belfast City Hall where a stage will be erected for
a rally which is expected to be finished by 1.30pm.
Anti-Internment League spokesman Gerard Fitzpatrick said some city
centre traders and loyalists had raised objections about the location
and timing of last year’s march. “This year’s route means no such
objections from this quarter.”
He said that as well as remembering the introduction of internment, the
parade has been organised to raise awareness of the continued use of
internment by the British and Free State governments by remand and
revocation of early release licences and through miscarriage of justice.
He added that the parade is open to people from all political
background, and had been organised with the support of community
representatives, individual trade union members and human rights
activists.
“This is an opportunity for people to peacefully demonstrate against
these actions,” he said.
A campaign to free one internee, Derry republican Tony
Taylor, is being officially launched at a public meeting in the city
next Tuesday. Mr Taylor, a spokesperson for Republican Network for
Unity, was jailed in Derry on March 10.
The SDLP and Sinn Fein both supported a motion calling for Mr Taylor’s
immediate release from prison at a council meeting last month.
A spokesperson for the campaign called on anyone with a regard for civil
liberties or human rights to attend Tuesday’s meeting and back the drive
to have Mr Taylor released from prison.
The ‘Free Tony Taylor’ campaign will be launched at a public meeting in
the Maldron Hotel on Tuesday at 7.30pm.
Posted by Jim on
———————————————————————
On Sunday 8th May, republicans from Tyrone and its Monaghan/Armagh
hinterland gathered at the Drumfurrer Monument to IRA Volunteers Jim
Lynagh and Padraig McKearney for a family-led Independent Commemoration.
Monaghan ex-POW and member of the James Connolly Society Monaghan John
Crawley gave the main oration. The following is the text of his speech.
———————————————————————
Twenty-nine years ago today, eight IRA Volunteers were Killed in Action
against British Crown Forces at Loughgall, Co. Armagh. The Monument
where we are assembled at today was built in honour of two of them, who
spent a lot of time in this particular area – Jim Lynagh and Padraig
McKearney. We remember with pride their comrades who died beside them:
Patrick Kelly, Declan Arthurs, Seamus Donnelly, Tony Gormley, Eugene
Kelly and Gerard O’Callaghan.
I never had the privilege of meeting Padraig or the other lads but knew
Jim quite well and had many conversations with him. Padraig from the
Moy, County Tyrone, was a staunch republican socialist. He came from a
family immersed in Irish republican activism. Both his grandfathers were
on IRA Active Service during the Tan War. Padraig was one of 38
republican prisoners who escaped from the H-Blocks in September 1983. He
immediately returned to IRA Active Service.
His family have paid a high price for their patriotism. His brother Sean
was killed on Active Service in May 1974. His brother Tommy was on
Hungerstrike for 53 days in Long Kesh in 1980. His brother Kevin and his
uncle Jack were murdered by Loyalists. Padraig McKearney had an
unrivalled reputation as a daring and courageous Volunteer.
Jim Lynagh from Monaghan Town was an outstanding Volunteer. His family
also paid a heavy price for bearing courageous sons. His brother Colm
served many years in Portlaoise Prison and his brother Michael, a member
of the INLA, died tragically while in prison. Perceptive and astute,
one of the many things that stood out about Jim was that he didn’t have
the awe most Volunteers seem to have held for the IRA leadership at that
time. Jim put nobody on a pedestal. While organisationally loyal and
respecting some of them as individuals he clearly didn’t trust others
and considered most to be militarily illiterate, lacking even the most
basic technical and tactical competence and proficiency.
From his experience, successful IRA areas and operations were due far
more to talented, capable and courageous local leaders and Volunteers –
and their support base on the ground – rather than the result of any
grand plan from on high. The Brits knew that too and their ‘Tasking and
Coordination Groups’ studied carefully who their SAS ambush teams and
Loyalist deathsquads should attempt to take out of the equation – and
who to leave undisturbed to rise through the ranks.
An English historian gave a description of the Irish who fought against
Britain during the American revolution in a manner that describes Jim
and Padraig to a tee. They were, he said, ‘the foremost, the most
irreconcilable, and the most determined to push the quarrel to the last
extremity’. The Brits considered Padraig McKearney and Jim Lynagh
dangerous adversaries. Brave and intelligent, they couldn’t be
frightened and they couldn’t be bought. A bad combination.
Mourners were told by the Provisional leadership at Jim’s funeral that
Loughgall would be the tombstone for British rule in Ireland.
Twenty-nine years later the Brits are going nowhere and the same
leadership now boast that they have buried the IRA. Nor do they miss an
opportunity to declare that since the Good Friday Agreement Ireland
unfree shall be at peace.
There is a contextual thread running through every British attempt at a
settlement since at least the mid-19th century. In the summer of 1921,
at the height of the Tan War, British Prime Minister Sir Lloyd George
sent a telegram to the then Sinn Fein leadership seeking negotiations.
This message was sent:
‘With a view to ascertaining how the association of Ireland with the
community of nations known as the British Empire may be reconciled with
Irish national aspirations.’
Reconciling Irish nationalism with the British state has dominated
British strategic thinking since British Prime Minister William
Gladstone first jettisoned the Liberal party’s hostility toward Irish
Home Rule and embraced it as a buffer between Irish independence and
British sovereignty.
The Fenian Rising in 1867 and their bombing campaign in London in the
late 1860s had a profound effect on Gladstone. In his view the three
grievances which flamed Fenianism were the established Protestant
Church, the land system and direct English rule. When informed by a
messenger in December 1868 that he had been charged with forming his
first Cabinet he remarked, ‘my mission is to pacify Ireland’.
A major concern was that, largely as a result of the Famine, an Irish
nation over a million strong now lived in America, hostile to England
yet beyond the reach of British jurisdiction and reprisals. Worse yet,
these Irish were experiencing life in a democracy within a republic and
were prospering. Many now had money and resources denied to them at home
and as a result of service in the American Civil War many thousands had
first class military training and combat experience.
The British government came to the conclusion that the Irish people in
Ireland itself had to be protected and insulated from what the London
Times called, ‘the despicable ideas inspired by American democracy’. In
addition, events within the UK, such as the 1867 Reform Act, doubled the
electorate and the rising tide of democracy had to be manipulated and
managed so as not to threaten the status quo.
Gladstone advised Queen Victoria that he intended to grant a series of
limited concessions to Ireland in order to buy off any serious attempt
at separation. He began by disestablishing the Church of Ireland as the
official state church in 1869 and bringing in an essentially useless
Land Act in 1870. During the 1880s he would, despite stiff opposition
from English and Irish Unionists, come to support the idea of Irish Home
Rule. All this not to satisfy Ireland but to pacify Ireland.
And so began British peace processing in Ireland, instigated to divert
and deflect the Irish people away from the path to independence and onto
ground Britain could manipulate and control. By the time of the Home
Rule debates, Protestant privilege and influence in Ireland, which was
based on land ownership, had diminished in most of Ireland, and a new
Catholic middle class had grown in strength and influence. Some had done
well out of the Famine.
Britain was intent on forming an alliance with the leadership of this
emerging Catholic elite and were preparing to grant them a degree of
local autonomy, making them their new partners and accomplices in
managing and administering the occupation. Imperial Britain came to the
conclusion long before Lenin that, ‘the best way to control the
opposition is to lead it ourselves’.
The degree to which Britain succeeded in fostering a loyal nationalist
opposition can be seen in John Redmond’s description of the 1916 Rising
as treason against the Irish people and the Irish Parliamentary Party’s
call for Irishmen to fight and die, not for Ireland, but for the British
Empire in the belief that unity between Nationalists and Unionists could
be fostered by bayonetting German boys in Flanders.
Incredibly, to this day some Nationalists still believe that alliances
with Unionism should be nurtured through attendance at British army war
memorial services and sentimentalising joint First World War service in
the very army that executed the 1916 Leadership and continues to occupy
our country. Apparently Wolfe Tone’s belief that Protestant and Catholic
unity should come about through the forging of a common national
citizenship free from England plays second fiddle to the idea of unity
through celebrating joint debasement as levies and mercenaries for the
enemy.
Depending on who was in power and other factors, British government
policy in Ireland between 1868 and 1916 oscillated between periods of
conciliation and coercion. What never changed was Britain’s
determination that UK parliamentary sovereignty would never be trumped
by Irish popular sovereignty. Every treaty and agreement up to and
including the Good Friday Agreement would uphold the fundamental
principal of UK parliamentary sovereignty and the primacy of British
law.
The rule of law is central to British strategy. As such the issue of
policing has been the cornerstone of their counter-insurgency
architecture – a strategy designed to legitimise the British state in
Ireland by conferring on Britain Irish assent to its presumption of
democratic entitlement and its monopoly on the legitimate use of force.
As Roger Casement said at his trial, ‘conquest gives no title’.
The 1916 rising threw a spanner into the Home Rule works and scuttled
the loyal nationalist opposition Britain had been counting on to keep
Ireland off the political radar. Subsequent events led to a British
alliance with Ulster Unionism to retain what control they could in
Ireland.
Britain, however, had no natural affinity with the Orange state beyond
one of utility. The Brits have never demurred from negotiating over the
heads of their allies in Ireland when it suited their interests. Tony
Blair was quite happy to help dismantle the Orange state if by doing so
the British state in Ireland could at last became politically viable. Of
course the Unionists didn’t like it. But to equate Unionist discomfiture
with impending victory is base sectarian reductionism.
The Proclamation of 1916, the 1918 election, the Declaration of
Independence and the Democratic Programme of the First Dail were
answered by the British in 1920 with the Government of Ireland Act. That
Act was the British government’s formal legislative declaration that it
rejected the concept of majority all-Ireland opinion and would refuse to
recognise Ireland as one democratic unit. The Act, authored by an
English Tory committee without the input of a single Irishman,
partitioned Ireland into a 26-county Southern Ireland and a six-county
Northern Ireland.
During the Civil War, former Republicans who accepted a settlement based
on this Act were given British guns and artillery to destroy Republicans
who didn’t. A small clique of IRA deserters, reinforced by a massive
influx of demobilised British soldiers of Irish provenance, manned Free
State firing squads as those Patriots who remained true to a republican
definition of democracy were tied to landmines and placed against
barracks walls.
As a result of the Good Friday Agreement, the British have annulled the
1920 Government of Ireland Act. There has been a deliberate and
self-serving attempt at misdirection over the ending of this Act, the
implication being that Britain has diluted its claim to sovereignty as
part of some transitional progression toward disengagement. This is
certainly not the case.
The UK government felt confident in doing so as a quid pro quo for the
downgrading of Articles 2 and 3 of the 26-County Constitution from a
constitutional imperative to a notional aspiration, because the Dublin
Government and all Nationalist parties that support the Agreement have
been co-opted to, and have formally endorsed and internalised, the
British narrative and its interpretation of Ireland’s democratic
limitations.
They have joined Britain as partners in declining to acknowledge Ireland
as one democratic unit and have conceded that fact in an international
agreement. They have legitimised the Unionist Veto to the point that
some former comrades have now discovered that Irish Unionists are
British. They have conferred the mantle of lawful authority upon Her
Majesty’s Constabulary, the PSNI, who, like the RUC at 90 percent
Protestant and the RIC at 80 percent Catholic, continue to stand in
British armed opposition to the republican and democratic principles of
the 1916 Proclamation.
Britain’s claim to sovereignty in Ireland resides in the 1801 Act of
Union, which remains firmly on her statute books. The Union flag
inspired by that Act, incorporating the Cross of St. Patrick, still
flies on Irish soil. The Harp, as a national symbol of Ireland, still
adorns the British Royal Standard and the United Kingdom’s Coat of Arms.
The Cross of St Patrick and the Harp are Irish national symbols and not
six-county symbols. When Prince William married Kate Middleton he wore
the uniform of the Irish Guards, not the Northern Irish Guards. It’s
ironic that Irish republicans and the British establishment are more
likely to take the long national view of Irish politics than Northern
Unionists or Southern Partitionists.
Britain continues to hijack Irish national symbols in its political and
military iconography and continues to work to deny Ireland a National
Parliament. The Brits never take their eye off the ball and have
formally and informally protested to the Dublin Government any proposal
to provide elected Northern representatives speaking rights in Leinster
House as outside the terms of the Good Friday Agreement.
The UK government, with the enthusiastic support of many Free State TDs,
will not countenance the Dail regaining any semblance of the genuinely
national assembly it was between 1919 and 1922. One hundred years after
the 1916 Proclamation Ireland still has no ‘National Government,
representative of the whole people of Ireland and elected by the
suffrages of all her men and women’.
With Unionists a clear majority in only two of Ireland’s thirty-two
counties, Britain is looking at the demographics and planning for the
future. A ‘new republicanism’ is being encouraged and nurtured in which
the vision of a United Ireland, a 32-County national democracy, is
replaced by an ‘Agreed Ireland’, where the British stay and the Irish
agree to it. Under this ‘new republicanism’ we must no longer speak of
breaking the British connection but of respecting the British connection
as a gesture toward Unionism. It’s the ‘republican’ thing to do.
Republicans must dine with the British Queen and shake hands with the
Colonel-in-Chief of the Parachute Regiment and honour British war dead
in the name of reconciliation because reconciliation no longer means
reconciling Catholic, Protestant and Dissenter to the idea of a united
national citizenship but reconciling nationalists to the idea of the
permanence of the British connection in some guise or other.
We must find a place for Britishness in an agreed Ireland. Perhaps an
all-Ireland return to the British Commonwealth in return for some new
all-Ireland institutions buttressed by some ad hoc all-Ireland police
force? Of course, all-Ireland institutions are not always what they are
cracked up to be. The famine workhouses were an all-Ireland institution
and the Black and Tans were an all-Ireland police force. There is a
crucial distinction between the concepts of United Ireland and
All-Ireland. One is Irish Freedom, the other isn’t.
Under this scenario Irish Unionists are British because they choose to
be so. Let us ignore the fact that Irish Unionists don’t live in Britain
and rarely referred to themselves as British until after the first Home
Rule crisis and especially after partition. They took pride in the Royal
Irish Constabulary, the Royal Irish Regiments. In an Irishness that was
subservient to British interests – the Royal Irish, the Loyal Irish.
Yet, clearly, their sense of Britishness was always conditional upon
Britain maintaining Unionist supremacy. They were quite prepared to
rebel against the British government if Britain enacted the Home Rule
Act. It was the Unionist importation of German rifles and ammunition in
the Larne gun running incident in 1914 that introduced the gun into 20th
Century Irish politics. As late at the 1970s, Ian Paisley was advocating
a Rhodesian-style ‘Unilateral Declaration of Independence’ if Irish
Unity appeared a possibility.
What this political culture would not countenance was the 1916
Proclamation’s ideas of equality within the national democracy of a
United Ireland. Although they had lived quite happily in a United
Ireland under the British Crown for hundreds of years, they would never
willingly do so under a democratic Irish Republic and Britain would
ensure they wouldn’t have to.
Examine their symbolism. You won’t see a depiction of the British
parliament at Westminster on an Orange banner, only the crown of the
British monarchy – which is the feudal sponsor of the Protestant
Ascendancy and sectarian supremacy. Why would we respect that crown? Now
you can either buy into this nonsense and bluff the world that you are
doing so from some higher humanitarian, intellectual and moral plane or
you can wise up and have the courage to face the fact that decolonising
mind sets is going to be one of the most difficult phases in building a
national democracy.
There was no painless way to conquer Ireland and no painless way to
reconquer it. When the Union is over the plantation is over. The fact is
Unionists will be deeply hurt and demoralised by this. They won’t like
it and they may not like it for generations to come, as was the case for
Unionists in the Free State after the Treaty. That will be a major
challenge for our republic to work through. But don’t blame Republicans
for that. Britain engineered this mess. The process of genuine national
reconciliation can only begin when Britain leaves Ireland and can no
longer meddle in our internal affairs.
The American Loyalists who supported the British during the American
revolution didn’t want an American republic. The Boers didn’t want a
democratic South Africa. Israeli settlers don’t want a Palestinian
state. The French Pied Noir settlers didn’t want an independent Algeria.
The Confederacy didn’t want to let go of slavery. Ideologies and
political cultures based on imperial conquest and colonial expropriation
are, in the words of James Connolly, ‘crimes against human progress’.
Sometimes for humanity to progress certain belief systems must be
jettisoned and leave the historical stage. There is no gainsaying it.
Making Ireland British is an English project – keeping Ireland British
can never be a republican one. The republican project is to end the
British connection, not to respect it. Our concept of reconciliation
lies in reconciling all Irishmen to the democratic ideal of equality and
the republican concept of majority rule, tempered by a protection of
minority rights. Rights as Irish citizens, not as wards of a foreign
power. Republicans take a national view of the national question. Why do
our enemies seem consistently surprised about that? What part of
‘national’ do they not understand?
Partition and the Good Friday Agreement are basically tribal settlements
rooted in difference. Irish republicanism is inspired by a proposition.
That proposition was enunciated by Wolfe Tone and further refined and
articulated in the Proclamation of 1916 – the proposition that Britain
can be dispensed with and Irishmen and women, of whatever persuasion and
none, could forge a common national citizenship based upon democracy,
equality and fraternity. That’s the vision. That is Irish
republicanism.
Don’t allow the people who told you the path to Irish Freedom lay
through conceding the Unionist Veto, reviving Stormont, endorsing Her
Majesty’s constabulary as lawful authority and internalising British
constitutional constraints such as the triple-locked border poll lure
you into believing a so-called Agreed Ireland can attain some degree of
moral ascendancy over the democratic and republican principles inherent
in a United Ireland. Britain has no place in Ireland. Republicans must
ensure that the fantasy of a permanent British redoubt imprinted with
Irish democratic assent to its political or cultural legitimacy becomes
British imperialism’s last dream before death.
When you cut to the chase a lot of this is coming from the Provisional
‘think-tank’, who are trying to redefine Irish republicanism and modify
the concept of Irish Unity to conform to the limitations of its
leadership and their inability to devise a strategy that would bring the
republican project to a timely and successful conclusion. The think-tank
should think again.
Leadership is not about demonstrating how many Jesuitical contortions a
movement can be forced to make before it becomes permanently twisted.
Leadership is based on trust. Trust that the ideology is correct and the
vision based on that ideology is the right one and is believed by the
leadership and not just spouted as a mobilising aspiration around which
to build a political base that may one day service a political career.
Trust that the vision will never be tempered or tailored or turned by
fear of the consequences in pursing it or modified by personal ambition.
Trust that the strategy driven by that vision will be pursued
professionally and responsibly with due diligence and care to the people
tasked with carrying it out. Trust that the commitment to Irish Freedom
is not a perishable commodity.
Keep your passion for freedom alive. Don’t be demoralised by beaten
dockets or the self-serving sophistry of careerists and carpetbaggers.
Stay on a republican trajectory and do not be lured into a British
orbit. Don’t worry if you don’t have the strategy worked out or all the
answers just yet. Republicans have been through years of false trails
and false prophets and are only lately picking up the pieces. It takes
time to gain traction and to build an unstoppable momentum.
James Connolly wasn’t captured with a fully-costed programme for
government in his back pocket. Sometimes you just have to do the right
thing, regardless of whether you have accounted for the minutiae of
every conceivable event and scenario. Keep it republican, keep it
democratic and keep it socially just. Republicans are still working this
through. In the meantime be certain that Britain’s busy bees are
infiltrating every republican group in order steer them in the wrong
direction – as they did so successfully with others.
Like James Connolly, Jim, Padraig, Patrick, Declan, Seamus, Tony, Eugene
and Gerard went out to break the connection between this country and
Britain and to establish an Irish Republic. They died at their posts.
No-one is using this platform to ask you to kill or or be killed for
Irish Freedom. Remain at your posts though. Don’t be seduced into
servicing the lie. Don’t abandon the truth. The truth that, as James
Connolly put it at his court martial one hundred years ago when he said:
‘The British Government has no right in Ireland, never had any right in
Ireland, and never can have any right in Ireland.’
Do not join in the crime against human progress. Do not reconcile
yourself to the British presence. Do not concede the political and moral
legitimacy of the ‘differences carefully fostered by an alien
government’. That is not the republican thing to do.
At this exact moment twenty nine years ago today Jim Lynagh, Padraig
McKearney, Patrick Kelly, Declan Arthurs, Seamus Donnelly, Tony Gormley,
Eugene Kelly, and Gerard O’Callaghan had only hours left to live. Lads,
if you can hear us, thank you for your sacrifice. You never abandoned
your post – and neither will we.
Posted by Jim on
By Gerry Adams (for Leargas)
35 years ago, on May 5th 1981, Bobby Sands died on hunger strike after
66 days without food. He was the first of 10 men to die in the H Blocks
of Long Kesh that terrible summer of 1981. For those republican
political prisoners in the H-Blocks, in Armagh Women’s prison and in
other prisons in Ireland and England there was a shared sense of grief
and anger.
For the families of those who died and for the rest of us and the tens
of thousands of ordinary citizens in Ireland and around the world who
campaigned on their behalf, this was our Easter 1916. It was a
transformative, watershed moment in our lives but also in the struggle
for Irish freedom.
To their families and comrades and supporters the hunger strikers are
heroes. They were courageous comrades who selflessly gave their lives
that others might not experience the brutality and savagery of a vicious
prison regime. And in their painful deaths, watched daily by families
and friends, and reported by a generally hostile media, they defied the
Thatcher government’s efforts to criminalise them and the struggle that
they were part of.
When it ended in October 1981 it appeared that the prisoners had lost.
But in reality that long and difficult summer resulted in a few short
years with the demands of the prisoners being met. The hunger strike
also internationalised the struggle in a way that nothing else had. It
facilitated connections with other political and liberation movements
and it saw a huge growth in the number of republican activists. It
helped accelerate the acceptance by republicans of electoralism as part
of strategy.
All of this opened up significant new opportunities, including within a
decade secret contacts with the British government and efforts by Sinn
Fein to explore the potential for a peace process.
Several years later David Beresford, the Guardian’s correspondent to the
north, published the definitive account of the hunger strike – Ten Men
Dead. David died last week and his funeral service took place on
Tuesday. He was remarkable man and an exceptional writer, author and
journalist. He arrived into the north in 1978 at a dangerous and
difficult time.
The prison protests in the H-Blocks and in Armagh women’s prison had
been going on for three years. There were some 500 protesting prisoners
and hundreds more in other prisons in Ireland and England.
The use by the British state of widespread torture in the interrogation
centres; of shoot-to-kill actions: and of collusion between state forces
and unionist paramilitaries in the killing of political opponents and
civilians was widespread. The IRA war against the British state showed
no sign of abating.
There was also a major propaganda battle taking place. Many in the
establishment media played the game. Their first port of call when
anything happened were the numerous press officers working for Britain’s
Northern Ireland Office or for the RUC or British Army. Frequently they
went no further. The British line was their line. And their editorial
bosses, whether in Belfast or London, were happy to sustain this
relationship. Censorship, official and unofficial, was deep rooted and
corrosive.
This was the north and the state of conflict into which David arrived.
From the beginning he looked beyond the official spin. he travelled
widely in the north; made a point of speaking to republicans, loyalists
and community activists, and to those directly affected by the war.
He had a healthy scepticism; was a good listener; and his writing was
insightful, informative and discerning. Occasionally I met him also to
discuss the current politics of the moment.
All of us who knew him were struck by his commitment to truthful
journalism. Consequently, when he broached the possibility of writing a
book on the hunger strike there were no objections. He was trusted to
tell an honest account of that very difficult time in our history and in
our lives. To aid him in this we gave him access to the ‘comms’ – the
messages that were smuggled out from the prison.
In the main these were written on thin tiny cigarette papers, or torn
scraps of paper from the Gideon bible that each cell had, using the
refill of biros hidden inside the bodies of the prisoners. They were
then wrapped in cling film and smuggled out.
Ten Men Dead is probably the best book written about any aspect of the
conflict in Ireland. It remains as potent a piece of journalism today as
it was when first published. It is a compelling book; impossible to put
down once you begin to read it. It is a passionate book that tugs at the
emotions. It provides a harrowing and moving account of one of the most
extraordinary events during the decades of war in the north of Ireland.
Its longevity; its’ honesty and David’s ability through his words to
empathise with those he was writing about have combined to ensure that
Ten Men Dead has never been out of print.
A few years after the hunger strike David moved back to South Africa to
record the historic changes that were taking place in that country. In
1995 I had the good fortune to meet him again in South Africa when a
Sinn Fein delegation travelled there to meet with Madiba – Nelson
Mandela – and others in the ANC leadership.
The IRA had the previous year called a cessation and we want to discuss
with the ANC their strategies, tactics and general approaches to their
peace process and the lessons for ours.
By this stage David was suffering from Parkinsons. It is an awful
disease but he faced it with courage and great dignity and wrote about
his experience. I also watched the television documentary he made
detailing the operation in 2002 to ease the symptoms.
David Beresford believed in the rights of people; in human rights. He
wanted to tell their stories in a way that would help others understand
what was happening.
As we in Ireland remember our friend Bobby Sands and his nine comrades
it is appropriate that we also remember David Beresford who shone a
light on the horrors of the H-Blocks.
Bobby was a fine writer also. A poet. From within the confines of his
prison cell, naked and brutalised he smuggled out words that resonate
today. Among them is his poem The Rhythm of Time. It applies equally to
David Beresford:
There’s an inner thing in every man,
Do you know this thing my friend?
It has withstood the blows of a million years,
And will do so to the end.
It is found in every light of hope,
It knows no bounds nor space
It has risen in red and black and white,
It is there in every race.
It lights the dark of this prison cell,
It thunders forth its might,
It is ‘the undauntable thought’, my friend,
That thought that says ‘I’m right!’
On behalf of Sinn Fein I want to extend my deepest condolences to
David’s family. To Marianna, Belinda and Norman; and Ellen and their son
Joris, and to David’s elder brother Garth. Ar dheis de go raibh a anam
dilis.