subscribe to the RSS Feed

Friday, August 14, 2026

Foster remarks depressing

Posted by Jim on February 7, 2017


Irish News Editorial.Belfast. Tuesday, February 7, 2017

WHEN the crisis provoked by the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) scandal brought the outgoing Assembly to a premature end last month, DUP leader Arlene Foster predicted that a “brutal election” lay ahead.

Until now the campaign had actually been very restrained with the parties generally restricting themselves to low key and largely predictable exchanges on the obvious themes.

However, Mrs. Foster plainly concluded yesterday that the political temperature needed to be raised immediately by launching a particularly outspoken attack on those associated with the Irish language sector.

She said that, as far as she was concerned, there would never be an Irish language act at Stormont and suggested that, in numerical terms, a much stronger case existed for legislation in support of Polish speakers.

The Polish community here is both highly respected and fast growing but there are no indications that its members have any real interest in obtaining some form of judicial protection for their language.

Their overwhelming legal concern in the recent past has been hoping that the racist extremists who have regularly targeted Poles living in Loyalist [Unionist/Protestant] areas can be brought before the courts.

Most observers will have been left in no doubt that, rather than promoting Polish culture, Mrs Foster was much more focused on the DUP’s familiar practice of going out of its way to insult Irish language enthusiasts.

Previous similar interventions by Gregory Campbell and Sammy Wilson might have been regarded as examples of buffoonery from fringe figures but there was something profoundly depressing about the DUP leader heading down the same childish route with such enthusiasm.

It was striking that she could only associate Irish language issues with Sinn Féin when it is well known that all the main parties in the Dáil, as well as the SDLP and Alliance north of the border, have their own clearly defined policies in this regard.

The Irish language also belongs to all sides of our divided society, and many dedicated and well informed speakers within the Protestant and Unionist tradition will have been totally dismayed by Mrs. Foster’s stance.

It would be difficult to imagine a more provocative remark from a senior politician than her attempt to dismiss any prospect of an Irish language act by saying; “If you feed a crocodile, it will keep coming back for more.”

The debate over the proposed legislation will remain on the agenda, and, like a range of other measures, will require careful and mature consideration during wider discussions.

It was hugely disappointing yesterday to find the DUP effectively turning its back on this process and instead giving the firm impression that its simple priority is diverting attention from its role in the RHI debacle.

Gerry Adams to attend Trump White House event St. Paddy’s Day despite opposition

Posted by Jim on February 6, 2017

Sinn Féin President Gerry Adams TD will travel to the United States during the St Patrick’s week.Sinn Féin/Flickr

Sinn Féin President Gerry Adams TD will travel to the USA during the St Patrick’s week for a short 48-hour visit to brief Irish American leaders and politicians on the negotiations in the North, Brexit and the needs of the undocumented Irish.

This will include a meeting with the Friends of Ireland in Congress, Irish American representatives, and, if invited, he will attend the Speaker’s Lunch and an event in the White House.

Adams said:

“At this critical time in the Irish peace process it does not make sense for Irish leaders to exclude ourselves from an opportunity to engage on critical issues like the crisis in the political institutions, Brexit, the future of the Good Friday Agreement, Irish unity and the rights of the undocumented Irish in the USA.

“Consequently I will travel to the USA in March.

“I understand that all of this is happening at a time of deep concern in Ireland and globally at the actions of Donald Trump since his election as President of the United States. Sinn Féin has been to the fore in opposing these measures.

“We have raised our concerns in the Dáil, written to President Trump directly to outline our opposition and Michelle O’Neill has made clear that if returned to the Executive we would not issue an invite to him to visit Ireland.

“Since Bill Clinton lifted the ban on my entry to the United States in early 1994 Sinn Féin have had to work with a number of US Presidents who we strongly disagreed with in relation to the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, their support for Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people, and the blockade of Cuba. We raised our objections publicly and with each of them and will continue to do so with this President.

“Sinn Féin’s priority now and at all times is to advance Ireland’s national interests, most especially the peace process and the demand for Irish re-unification. We are also very mindful that the Saint Patrick’s Day celebrations are bigger than President Trump. It is the biggest event in the Irish American calendar.”

BRITISH RULE IS THE PROBLEM IN IRELAND – MARTIN GALVIN, AOH Division President

Posted by Jim on

Martin Galvin, New York Attorney-At-Law and contributer to the 1916 Societies One Ireland One Vote Campaign, responds to Trevor Ringland in an ongoing exchange in the letters column of the Irish News.

Trevor Ringland blames the conflict in Ireland on some endemic character flaw, denying Ireland’s population ‘the common sense to live in peace with one another and with their neighbours’. How dare I advocate what Theresa Villiers termed a ‘pernicious counter narrative’, blaming benevolent Britain for anything?

Mr. Ringland says the 1920 Government of Ireland Act put ‘constitutional matters on this island in the hands of the Irish’. Why not begin with how Ireland’s inability to live in peace with their neighbours necessitated an English invasion, approved by an English Pope, to help the Irish practice religion? Irish character flaws made Britain follow up with the Penal Laws, Cromwell etc, teaching the Irish how to live in peace with their neighbours.

The British ‘put matters in Irish hands’ by executing patriots who proclaimed national independence in 1916, answering an overwhelming all-Ireland vote ratifying all-Ireland independence with Black and Tan terror and carving out the largest area they could hold, based on sectarian hegemony. Those voting British rule got a veto. The democratic majority got threatened with ‘immediate and terrible war’.

Westminster prohibited religious discrimination. Why fault Britain for condemning nationalists to a half-century as victims of discrimination in Britain’s Orange State? Mr. Ringland claims that ‘those problems were addressed after the Civil Rights campaign’. They certainly were ‘addressed’, by those like DUP founder Ian Paisley and the RUC, at places like Burntollet Bridge and Duke Street. However Internment, the Ballymurphy Massacre and shooting down civil rights marchers on Bloody Sunday ‘addressed’ such problems in a way that convinced many that British rule would not heed moral appeals.

British collusion with loyalist criminals in sectarian murders, says Mr. Ringland, ‘is not supported by the facts’. Panorama’s Britain’s Secret Terror Deals, books like Lethal Allies, studies by Relatives for Justice, the Da Silva review and accounts in this newspaper support the facts of collusion. But why entertain facts which indict Britain? I would not trouble readers with such inconvenient facts, except this mindset is at the heart of the breakdown at Stormont today.

Mr. Ringland is correct that I believe Westminster serves English interests. Brexit, austerity, the denial of legacy funding etc. were not designed to help in Ireland. My aspiration is a United Ireland governed in Irish interests, which gives equal rights to Mr. Ringland, and all of its people, and is not subordinate to British interests, partition or an institutionalised sectarian hegemony. The flaw in Ireland is not any endemic Irish defect but the myopia of those who blame Ireland for problems caused by British rule.

Romancing the Truth — The Legendary ‘Molly Malone’

Posted by Jim on February 5, 2017

Who was Molly Malone? . . . That is a very good question, a question that has had many historians baffled, and continues to be debated by experts in this field for many a decade. Stranger than fiction, an inspiration to many millions of people all over the world, not only for her singing of “Cockles and Muscles” as she plied her fish wares, but for her beauty. Molly Malone and “Cockles and Muscles” cause many an Irish emigrants heart to weep, for that nostalgic magic has wooed the Irish and their descendants back to Ireland since they first began to emigrate, in this particular case, back to Dublin.

Some sources would suggest that Molly Malone [all of 17 years of age] was indeed a historical figure who trod this earth approximately 300 years ago. These same sources ascribe her a father and mother called Patrick and Coleen Malone. Other sources would suggest that she is the illegitimate child of a nobleman and a poor Irish seamstress. She lived in Howth or Dublin [in the tenements in Moore Street] depending on which sources one reads. Yet no records exist as to where she was born or indeed where she resided, only vague mentions of Howth or Dublin. This on its own means nothing, as in this era, it would be months, maybe years before the parents or guardians of a newborn child would get around to registering a birth, if at all. The impact this young woman had on those who knew her, was so great that she was known all over Dublin and it would appear, way beyond the boundaries of Dublin and the Irish shores.

She was like a ray of sunshine, growing up in the poverty and depravity-stricken streets of Dublin, where she became known.

As she pushed her wheelbarrow through the narrow streets of Dublin, her delicate figure with long auburn hair blowing in the wind, her melodious voice singing of  “cockles and muscles” and her skirts swirling around her with the grace of a queen, she plied her trade and was a sight to behold, even in the mean tenement streets of Dublin. Yet this song was published first in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1883 by the Francis brothers. [Molly, by the way, is said to have died in 1699.] The song was published by Day in London in 1884, and composed by James Yorkston in Edinburgh, with yet other versions being copied over the years, not least by our own Irish balladeers – The Dubliners, Sinéad O’Connor, The Celtic Horitzer Folk Band, and others. Some sources suggest that “Cockles and Muscles” is based on a very similar tragic mode of popular music in this era, much like, “Oh my Darling Clementine” in 1880. Sources also suggest that while Molly Malone may or may not have been a historical figure, the song was attributed to her only because it had Dublin in its name.

Other sources would suggest that she may have plied more than her wares of fish by day, however, as daylight fell over the mean streets of Dublin. Many believe she plied another ware . . . herself. This too was common in this era because of the immense poverty in those days where young women were forced to sell their beauty to strangers in order to survive.

Her beauty and her grace, some suggest, won over the heart of a young man called Timothy Pendleton, who cared not one jot for how Molly Malone made her living as he was very much in love with this Dublin colleen. Timothy made a meager living by playing a fiddle as a busker on the streets of Dublin and fell in love with Molly, meeting her every day at the same place where she plied her wares. This source suggests that one day when Molly did not turn up to meet him, he went looking for her.

Racing across all of the narrow streets of Dublin in haste, he knew that something must be amiss when Molly had not turned up to meet him.  Alas, he was too late, as he came upon a crowd of people, standing, weeping and wailing, where a body was lying prostrate on the ground. People were attending to her, tears running down their faces — there was his Molly. She had died of a fever, the song goes, infected by one of her clients with cholera. A Father Finnegan of nearby Saint Bart’s had been informed, and he, too, was present as he administered the last rites of the Catholic Church to Molly where she lay.

With howling grief and gnashing of teeth, the people of the tenements stood wrapped in each other’s arms; in grief, some attending to her body and others just wailing as they watched the lifeless body of young Molly Malone being carried indoors for the mourning process which lasted three days — among them stood Timothy Pendleton, in shock and disbelief.

The funeral was attended by many thousands of people, as they came from all over Dublin and way beyond to stand weeping, trying to get a place in the nearby church, pushing and shoving to get closer to her coffin. Public houses were closed for 16 miles around as the people mourned. For weeks after the funeral, Timothy wandered the narrow streets of Dublin, unable to play his fiddle, with a glint of madness in his eyes, haggard and unable to get the sight of Molly’s prostrate body out of his mind. He made a decision, some sources would suggest, to leave Dublin because he was unable to walk around there, knowing that Molly would not be meeting him anymore. He got a job on a merchant ship sailing to Portsmouth, England. He settled there, and became quite a businessman, never playing his fiddle again.

One night, though, the urge came over him to play the fiddle, as he sat on an old wooden barrel on the docks, all alone in the dark night feeling nostalgic and lonely for his Molly Malone. “Cockles and Muscles” just appeared to roll off the fiddle before he had even touched it, and out of his mouth came Molly’s favorite song.

Then low and behold out of the dark night came the shadow of his beautiful Molly Malone . . .  As she appeared before him, he could not believe it! He asked, “Is it you Molly, why have you come back?” She told him that she had heard him play her song, and wanted to tell him how much she loved him, kissing him on the lips, to let him know that it was her. … As he continued to play, she faded away… and the fiddle kept playing and he kept singing:

In Dublin’s fair city, where the girls are so pretty

I first set my eyes on sweet Molly Malone

As she wheeled her wheelbarrow

Through streets broad and narrow

Crying cockles and mussels, alive, alive-O!

Alive, alive-O! Alive, alive-O!

Crying cockles and mussels, alive, alive-O!

She was a fish-monger, but sure ’twas no wonder

For so were her father and mother before

And they each wheeled their barrow

Through streets broad and narrow

Crying cockles and mussels, alive, alive-O!

Alive, alive-O! Alive, alive-O!

Crying cockles and mussels, alive, alive-O!

She died of a fever, and no one could save her

And that was the end of sweet Molly Malone

But her ghost wheels her barrow

Through streets broad and narrow

Crying cockles and mussels, alive, alive-O!

Alive, alive-O! Alive, alive-O!

Crying cockles and mussels, alive, alive-O!

However, the last word on this particular article must go to Sean Murphy, a noted genealogist-historian-lecturer:

Molly Malone attracted attention in Dublin only because the song was attributed to Dublin. Before the creation of the bizarre legend that Molly Malone was a real person who lived in the seventeenth century, many people were under the impression that she was, in fact, a fishmonger in a Victorian setting, and this is indeed the Molly Malone portrayed on the cover of Walton’s 1920 or 1930s edition of [the sheet music for] ‘Cockles and Mussels,’ set in a silhouette of Nelson’s Column in the background, with a handcart. This nineteenth-century figure would have formed a better basis for a statue of a fishmonger. The Grafton Street sculpture is so false, both in its setting and form, that it might be better if it were removed to save the city further ridicule and replaced by an authentic statue of Molly in nineteenth-century dress, sited perhaps, in the Moore Street area where Molly’s present-day successors, fruit and fish-sellers, now ply their trade. But, sure, what harm is there in a few liberties with the truth, and, isn’t it nice to have an attractive fake when so much of the real heritage of Dublin has been destroyed.

A man it would appear who was not afraid to pull any punches then is this historian!

So it would appear that although all kinds of inference have been made in connection with the song “Molly Malone,” which does not bear any resemblance to the now familiar Molly Malone character that we have all come to know and love, it has not stopped  —  we Irish having claimed her and the song as our own.

Further Info

The Molly Malone statue in Grafton Street was presented to Dublin City by Jury’s Hotel Group to mark the Millennium. It was unveiled by then-Mayor of Dublin Ben Briscoe during the Millennium, with June 13th being declared as Molly Malone Day. The statue was relocated to Suffolk Street on July 18th, 2014, to make way for the Luas track-laying work to be completed.

Since the Molly Malone statue has gone on display it has been groped repeatedly — enough so that its bronze hue has begun to wear off on the bosom!!

A copy of Apollo’s Medley, dating to around 1790 that was published in Doncaster, in the U.K., was rediscovered in 2010, and this publication contains the song “Sweet Molly Malone,“ on Page 78 — the last line of the song is  “Och! I’ll roar and I’ll groan, My Sweet Molly Malone, till I’m bone of your bone, and asleep in your bed…

The song was later reprinted in a collection titled “The Shamrock, a Collection of Irish Songs [1831].” Later that year it was published in The Edinburgh literary journal and titled “Molly Malone.”

Sláinte.

Senior judge is right to voice concern over delays in legacy cases

Posted by Jim on

Irish News Editorial. Belfast. Saturday,  January 28, 2017

The Lord Chief Justice, in a speech to the Victims and Survivors Forum yesterday, made no attempt to mask his considerable dismay at the lack of progress in dealing with legacy cases in Northern Ireland.

Sir Declan Morgan’s exasperation was apparent in the tone of his remarks, saying that the past 12 months have been `a wasted year.’

He added that we are now in a `period of inaction’ that will carry through until the end of March at the very least and it is unclear when there will be an opportunity to move forward.

This was a deeply disheartening message for the victims and survivors of our troubled past to hear but it is not the first time that the north’s most senior judge has spoken out on this issue.

Once again, Sir Declan expressed disappointment at the lack of a response to his request for funding but rightly pointed out that this is an even greater blow for families who have already been waiting decades in some instances.

The DUP is being blamed for blocking funds and it is notable that the party is now trying to divert attention away from RHI and instead is trying to make the potential prosecution of British soldiers who served during the Troubles an election issue.

The Lord Chief Justice rejected any suggestion that he was giving priority to cases holding the state to account rather than paramilitaries, insisting that he is determined to deliver outcomes for all victims and survivors.

This week, another senior legal figure, Director of Public Prosecutions Barra McGrory, also hit back at those questioning his impartiality amid claims that a `witch-hunt’ is being pursued against ex-military personnel.

As Mr McGrory pointed out, there have been only three decisions involving former soldiers in recent times, two resulting in prosecution and one that did not.

Comments by former Tory minister Gerald Howarth, who used parliamentary privilege to accuse Mr McGrory of `supporting’ Sinn Féin, are deeply disturbing.

For families waiting for truth and justice, further delays in resolving these important matters are profoundly dispiriting.

Hopes had been raised after a senior judge reviewed legacy cases and the judiciary took control of these much delayed inquests.

It is politics, not the legal system, which is blocking progress.

Sir Declan said yesterday that in the absence of additional resources for a Legacy Inquest Unit, it would be decades before all outstanding cases are completed.

This is plainly unacceptable and it is imperative that the legal authorities are allowed to get on with this work.