Posted by Jim on February 18, 2018
There is mounting concern that unionists in the north of Ireland are
incapable of treating nationalists with respect after the DUP suddenly
backed away from a deal which would have legislated for the rights for
Irish language speakers.
Twelve years after the DUP first signed up to an Irish Language Act in
the St Andrews Agreement, its senior members became panicked this week
by the prospect of that finally coming to pass. The legislation could
have meant the language becoming visible in unionist areas and would
have paved the way for the return of power-sharing in the north of
Ireland.
However, the arrival into Belfast of the British Prime Minister and
Irish Taoiseach on Monday, amid reports that a deal was to be signed,
generated a sectarian backlash among unionist extremists. On Wednesday
the nonplussed DUP leader Arlene Foster announced that the talks were at
an end.
Her party’s refusal to accept official status for the Irish language has
become a symbol of the party’s sense of supremacy over the nationalist
community, as well as its refusal to accept the ‘parity of esteem’
referred to in the 1998 Good Friday Agreement.
The DUP has also refused to countenance the prospect of marriage
equality, adding to a growing conviction that the DUP may never yield on
equality issues.
British Direct Ruler Karen Bradley is due to update MPs at Westminster
next week, amid speculation of a possible Assembly election or a return
to full Direct Rule from London. Speaking during a walkabout in Belfast
on Friday, she said it had been “a difficult week” but said she believed
there was still a way to restore powersharing in Belfast.
Sinn Fein president Mary Lou McDonald said ‘a draft agreement was in
place’ before the DUP walked away from it. She revealed that there had
actually been a compromise plan for three related pieces of legislation,
on the Irish language, Ulster-Scots and cultural diversity.
However, Mrs Foster has insisted no draft agreement was in place. “I
regret that we didn’t reach an agreement because they were insisting on
having this free-standing Irish language act,” she said.
Both parties have refused to reveal specific details of the
negotiations, insisting that confidentiality is still required because
the process could e revived at some stage. No imminent attempt to
restart the talks is likely.
Sinn Fein negotiator Conor Murphy said that the “good faith” that has
existed during the negotiations “evaporated” with the DUP move on
Wednesday.
“We had reached an accommodation, everyone involved in the process
understood that, and the DUP failed to close the deal in relation to
that and abruptly called a halt to proceedings,” he said.
The 26 County Minister for Foreign Affairs, Simon Coveney, said the
collapse of negotiations was “hugely disappointing” and insisted there
was “no appetite” for a return to full Direct Rule from London. He said
he believed an “accommodation” on the key disputes was close and the
parties were just hammering out how the “basket of legislation” could be
presented.
“We didn’t see a final text from the two parties but we had a clear
understanding of where this was going,” Mr Coveney said.
At a press conference in Belfast, the Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald
said that by the end of last week the DUP and Sinn Fein had agreed a
draft agreement to restore Stormont. “At that time we advised the DUP
leadership that the deal should be closed before those opposed to it
could unpick what we had achieved,” she said.
But the DUP leader Arlene Foster said no draft agreement was in place
and that Sinn Fein “certainly didn’t have an offer of an Irish language
act”.
She later said she would not agree to anything that “diminishes the
Britishness of Northern Ireland” and claimed a Sinn Fein insistence on
the Irish Language Act would “hold Northern Ireland to ransom”.
“I am not going to do anything that will impinge on the lives of those
of us who don’t engage with the Irish language,” she said.
She accused the new Sinn Fein leader of “bullying” and “trying to put
out propaganda.” She added that full Direct Rule “is always a second
best option… but it is the only option at the moment.”
Former Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams, who has remained involved in the
negotiations, insisted progress had been made despite the “step back” by
the DUP.
“The focus now is on getting the final bits and pieces tied down and
producing an agreement that is fair and balanced, based on equality and
the rights of citizens, and which creates the opportunity for more
progress in the time ahead,” he said.
“In a very real sense this is the last chance agreement.”
Posted by Jim on
There is mounting concern that unionists in the north of Ireland are
incapable of treating nationalists with respect after the DUP suddenly
backed away from a deal which would have legislated for the rights for
Irish language speakers.
Twelve years after the DUP first signed up to an Irish Language Act in
the St Andrews Agreement, its senior members became panicked this week
by the prospect of that finally coming to pass. The legislation could
have meant the language becoming visible in unionist areas and would
have paved the way for the return of power-sharing in the north of
Ireland.
However, the arrival into Belfast of the British Prime Minister and
Irish Taoiseach on Monday, amid reports that a deal was to be signed,
generated a sectarian backlash among unionist extremists. On Wednesday
the nonplussed DUP leader Arlene Foster announced that the talks were at
an end.
Her party’s refusal to accept official status for the Irish language has
become a symbol of the party’s sense of supremacy over the nationalist
community, as well as its refusal to accept the ‘parity of esteem’
referred to in the 1998 Good Friday Agreement.
The DUP has also refused to countenance the prospect of marriage
equality, adding to a growing conviction that the DUP may never yield on
equality issues.
British Direct Ruler Karen Bradley is due to update MPs at Westminster
next week, amid speculation of a possible Assembly election or a return
to full Direct Rule from London. Speaking during a walkabout in Belfast
on Friday, she said it had been “a difficult week” but said she believed
there was still a way to restore powersharing in Belfast.
Sinn Fein president Mary Lou McDonald said ‘a draft agreement was in
place’ before the DUP walked away from it. She revealed that there had
actually been a compromise plan for three related pieces of legislation,
on the Irish language, Ulster-Scots and cultural diversity.
However, Mrs Foster has insisted no draft agreement was in place. “I
regret that we didn’t reach an agreement because they were insisting on
having this free-standing Irish language act,” she said.
Both parties have refused to reveal specific details of the
negotiations, insisting that confidentiality is still required because
the process could e revived at some stage. No imminent attempt to
restart the talks is likely.
Sinn Fein negotiator Conor Murphy said that the “good faith” that has
existed during the negotiations “evaporated” with the DUP move on
Wednesday.
“We had reached an accommodation, everyone involved in the process
understood that, and the DUP failed to close the deal in relation to
that and abruptly called a halt to proceedings,” he said.
The 26 County Minister for Foreign Affairs, Simon Coveney, said the
collapse of negotiations was “hugely disappointing” and insisted there
was “no appetite” for a return to full Direct Rule from London. He said
he believed an “accommodation” on the key disputes was close and the
parties were just hammering out how the “basket of legislation” could be
presented.
“We didn’t see a final text from the two parties but we had a clear
understanding of where this was going,” Mr Coveney said.
At a press conference in Belfast, the Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald
said that by the end of last week the DUP and Sinn Fein had agreed a
draft agreement to restore Stormont. “At that time we advised the DUP
leadership that the deal should be closed before those opposed to it
could unpick what we had achieved,” she said.
But the DUP leader Arlene Foster said no draft agreement was in place
and that Sinn Fein “certainly didn’t have an offer of an Irish language
act”.
She later said she would not agree to anything that “diminishes the
Britishness of Northern Ireland” and claimed a Sinn Fein insistence on
the Irish Language Act would “hold Northern Ireland to ransom”.
“I am not going to do anything that will impinge on the lives of those
of us who don’t engage with the Irish language,” she said.
She accused the new Sinn Fein leader of “bullying” and “trying to put
out propaganda.” She added that full Direct Rule “is always a second
best option… but it is the only option at the moment.”
Former Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams, who has remained involved in the
negotiations, insisted progress had been made despite the “step back” by
the DUP.
“The focus now is on getting the final bits and pieces tied down and
producing an agreement that is fair and balanced, based on equality and
the rights of citizens, and which creates the opportunity for more
progress in the time ahead,” he said.
“In a very real sense this is the last chance agreement.”
Posted by Jim on February 16, 2018
Posted by Jim on
It is surely hard to fault the logic and common sense in this Editorial from the Irish News of Belfast.
And— it is must be added— it is perfectly clear that extreme Unionists do not want to accept equality or show respect towards the Irish language, which is Unionist code language for disrespecting the Catholics of Northern Ireland. Anyone who does not understand this, does not understand the basic history of how Northern Ireland came to be created by the British “Government of Ireland Act, 1920.’ It was created TO BE an anti-Irish and anti-Catholic state. —Fr. Sean McManus
DUP wobble strengthens SF
Irish News Editorial.Belfast. Friday,February 16, 2018
Following the collapse of the Stormont talks, the British and Irish governments have the unenviable task of putting a fractured process back together amid recriminations over what was or was not agreed.
Arlene Foster’s statement bringing the process to a halt came as a surprise given the indications in recent days that a deal was on the table.
Indeed, the visit by Leo Varadkar and Theresa May on Monday was taken as a sign that positive news was in the offing although we can now see that their empty-handed departure was an ominous portent.
In the end, it was the possibility of some form of compromise on an Irish language act that has scuppered the deal. As word filtered out that agreement had been reached on a possible three-stranded package, Unionists became jumpy, fuelled by unsubstantiated speculation about what might be in the deal and outrage from the usual quarters.
Rather than hold her nerve and sell this opportunity to get back into government – no mean achievement given Sinn Féin’s year-long reluctance to do so – the DUP leader buckled under pressure, plunging all of us into the political unknown.
It is profoundly disappointing that we have reached this point.
According to Michelle O’Neill, an ‘accommodation’ had been reached with the DUP but they had failed to close the deal. Mary Lou McDonald yesterday went further, saying there was a draft agreement and set out some of the issues covered.
The DUP is dismissing any suggestion of a deal, but it would explain why the two premiers arrived out of the blue in Belfast on Monday.
Collapsing the process after making progress on closing the gap between the two parties is a curious move by a leader who is looking increasingly peripheral as the DUP’s power base is focused on Westminster.
If anything, Mrs. Foster’s move will strengthen the new Sinn Féin leadership, who can point to their willingness to strike a deal only for Unionist intransigence to torpedo the prospect of a power-sharing administration.
Ultimately, both sides will have to get round a table once again but the DUP wobble shows it needs to prepare its supporters for movement.
Posted by Jim on
It is surely hard to fault the logic and common sense in this Editorial from the Irish News of Belfast.
And— it is must be added— it is perfectly clear that extreme Unionists do not want to accept equality or show respect towards the Irish language, which is Unionist code language for disrespecting the Catholics of Northern Ireland. Anyone who does not understand this, does not understand the basic history of how Northern Ireland came to be created by the British “Government of Ireland Act, 1920.’ It was created TO BE an anti-Irish and anti-Catholic state. —Fr. Sean McManus
DUP wobble strengthens SF
Irish News Editorial.Belfast. Friday,February 16, 2018
Following the collapse of the Stormont talks, the British and Irish governments have the unenviable task of putting a fractured process back together amid recriminations over what was or was not agreed.
Arlene Foster’s statement bringing the process to a halt came as a surprise given the indications in recent days that a deal was on the table.
Indeed, the visit by Leo Varadkar and Theresa May on Monday was taken as a sign that positive news was in the offing although we can now see that their empty-handed departure was an ominous portent.
In the end, it was the possibility of some form of compromise on an Irish language act that has scuppered the deal. As word filtered out that agreement had been reached on a possible three-stranded package, Unionists became jumpy, fuelled by unsubstantiated speculation about what might be in the deal and outrage from the usual quarters.
Rather than hold her nerve and sell this opportunity to get back into government – no mean achievement given Sinn Féin’s year-long reluctance to do so – the DUP leader buckled under pressure, plunging all of us into the political unknown.
It is profoundly disappointing that we have reached this point.
According to Michelle O’Neill, an ‘accommodation’ had been reached with the DUP but they had failed to close the deal. Mary Lou McDonald yesterday went further, saying there was a draft agreement and set out some of the issues covered.
The DUP is dismissing any suggestion of a deal, but it would explain why the two premiers arrived out of the blue in Belfast on Monday.
Collapsing the process after making progress on closing the gap between the two parties is a curious move by a leader who is looking increasingly peripheral as the DUP’s power base is focused on Westminster.
If anything, Mrs. Foster’s move will strengthen the new Sinn Féin leadership, who can point to their willingness to strike a deal only for Unionist intransigence to torpedo the prospect of a power-sharing administration.
Ultimately, both sides will have to get round a table once again but the DUP wobble shows it needs to prepare its supporters for movement.