subscribe to the RSS Feed

Saturday, August 8, 2026

The United Irishmen

Posted by Jim on June 12, 2018

What is that in your hand?
— It is a branch
Of What?
— Of the Tree of Liberty
Where did it first grow?
— In America
Where does it bloom?
— In France
Where did the seed fall?
— In Ireland
When will the moon be full?
— When the four quarters meet

A doctrine of the United Irishmen from the Cloyne are of County Cork in
December 1797.

1798 Rebellion

The immediate origins of the 1798 Rebellion in Ireland can be traced to
the setting up of the Society of United Irishmen in Belfast in October
1791. Inspired by the French Revolution, and with great admiration for
the new democracy of the United States, the United Irishmen were led by
Theobald Wolfe Tone, Thomas Russell, Henry Joy McCracken and William
Drennan. They came together to secure a reform of the Irish parliament;
and they sought to achieve this goal by uniting Protestant, Catholic and
Dissenter in Ireland into a single movement.

From the beginning, Dublin Castle, the seat of British government in
Ireland, viewed the new organisation with the gravest suspicion, and
with the outbreak of war between Britain and France in February 1793,
suspicion hardened to naked hostility. The unabashed admiration of the
United Irishmen for the French seemed akin to treason. The discovery of
negotiations between certain United Irishmen, notably Theobald Wolfe
Tone, and the French government confirmed suspicions and led to the
suppression of the society in May 1794.

Driven underground, the Society re-constituted itself as a secret,
oath-bound, organisation, dedicated to the pursuit of republican
government in a separate and independent Ireland. This was to be
achieved primarily by direct French military intervention. The plan came
closest to success following the arrival of a French invasion fleet,
carrying some 14,000 soldiers, off the southern coast of Ireland in
December 1796. Adverse weather conditions, however, prevented the French
from landing, and the fleet was forced to make its way back to France.
From this date on, Dublin Castle stepped up its war against the United
Irishmen, infiltrating their ranks with spies and informers, invoking
draconian legislation against ‘subversives’, turning a blind eye to
military excesses, and to those of the resolutely loyalist Orange Order,
and building up its defence forces lest the French should return in
strength.

By the spring of 1798, it appeared that Dublin Castle had been
successful in its determined efforts to destroy the Society’s capacity
for insurrection: many of its leaders were in prison, its organisation
was in disarray, and there seemed no possibility of French assistance.
Despite these difficulties, on the night of the 23rd/24th May, as
planned, the mail coaches leaving Dublin were seized – as a signal to
those United Irishmen outside the capital that the time of the uprising
had arrived.

However, as a result of the failure of Dublin to rise, the Rebellion
when it came was distinguished everywhere by a lack of concert and by a
lack of focus. The uprisings outside the capital had been intended by
the United Irishmen as supporting acts to the main event in Dublin, but
as Dublin did not perform as planned, rebels in outlying areas now found
themselves promoted to centre-stage. The lack of co-ordination between
the rebel theatres of war became key to the survival of Dublin Castle
and British rule in Ireland.

Rebellion

The initial outbreak of the rebellion was confined to a ring of counties
surrounding Dublin. The fighting in Kildare, Carlow, Wicklow and Meath
had been largely suppressed by government forces, and the capital
secured, when news arrived of a major rebel success in County Wexford.
On 29 May 1798 a terse communique was issued from Dublin Castle
confirming the rumours that had swept the city a day earlier. For the
first time in the rebellion, a detachment of soldiers – in this case
over 100 men of the North Cork Militia – had been killed in an open
engagement at Oulart, County Wexford. Wexford was ablaze.

The eruption of Wexford was an unexpected and unwelcome development for
Dublin Castle for the county had, by and large, escaped British scrutiny
in the months and years before the rebellion. The Castle had had very
few informers in Wexford and it had clearly considered this lack of
information as pointing towards a general obedience among the people
there. As a result, the garrison in that county numbered only a few
hundred men.

Two developments pitched Wexford over the edge and into full-scale
rebellion. The first of these was the campaign of British terror
unleashed – particularly to the north of the county from mid-May 1798
onwards. Reports of half-hangings, floggings, pitch-cappings and
house-burnings conducted principally by the North Cork Militia, under
the direction of loyalist magistrates, inflamed that part of County
Wexford that bordered on Wicklow, and induced panic everywhere. On 26th
May came stunning news of the summary execution of some 34 suspected
United Irishmen at Dunlavin, in south Wicklow; and there was a further
report that at Carnew, across the border in Wexford, 35 prisoners had
been summarily executed. There were fears of genocide. In terror, the
people – United Irishmen or not – prepared to resist.

Irish breakthrough

The second precipitating factor was the rebel victory at Oulart. This
victory in an open engagement, the first such for the rebels anywhere,
electrified the county, tempting many to join in who might otherwise
have hung back. It also had the effect of re-igniting the rebellion in
those areas near Dublin which had shown every sign of petering out; and
news of the rebels’ success at Oulart sparked off renewed efforts to
raise the hitherto quiescent north-east of Ireland, principally counties
Antrim and Down.

On 29th May, under the command of Father Murphy of Boolavogue, a priest
who had been in dispute with his bishop and who had reluctantly stepped
forward as leader, the Wexford insurgents, gaining strength as they
advanced, stormed Enniscorthy. The defences of the town were swept aside
by means of a stampede of cattle, and behind the terrified animals came
the rebels. The next day the rebel army, by now possibly 15,000 strong,
turned its attention to Wexford town. Plans to defend the county capital
were given up on news of the destruction of the approaching relief
column, and the town was abandoned by its defenders. The fall of Wexford
was the highpoint of the rebellion in the south-east: thereafter, the
rebels’ campaign met with defeats at New Ross, Arklow and Newtownbarry
and these had the effect of corralling them within the county.
Demoralised, and having suffered thousands of casualties, the rebels
fell back to re-group on Vinegar Hill, outside Enniscorthy.

Ulster rising

While rebellion had been raging in the south-east, the north generally
had been quiet. On receipt of news of the fighting in Leinster, there
had been a stormy meeting of the Ulster Provincial Council of the United
Irishmen on 29th May, at which there were loud protests at the failure
to rise in support. The existing leadership was accused of having
‘completely betrayed the people both of Leinster and Ulster’ and it was
promptly deposed. New men, Henry Joy McCracken among them, were now
appointed and plans were hurriedly made for a rising.

On 7th June a large number of rebels assembled in different parts of
County Antrim. In Ballymena, the green flag was raised over the market
house, and there were attacks on Larne, Glenarm, Carrickfergus,
Toomebridge and Ballymoney. The rebels, almost entirely Presbyterian,
captured Antrim town for a few hours but were then driven out ‘with
great slaughter’ by government artillery fire. An attempted mobilisation
in County Derry had come to nothing, and by the evening of 8th June, the
Antrim rebels had also lost heart and had begun drifting home. Some
weeks later McCracken was captured and executed.

As the rising in County Antrim, and elsewhere was petering out, on 10th
June (known thereafter as ‘Pike Sunday’) the United Irishmen in the
adjacent County Down began to assemble their forces. This was under the
command of Henry Monro, a shopkeeper from Newtownards and, ironically, a
direct descendant of General Robert Monro who had commanded the Scottish
force in Ulster in the wars of the 1640s. At Ballynahinch, some 12 miles
from Belfast, the rebels were routed on 12th-13th June, suffering
several hundred casualties. Military losses were three dead and some
thirty wounded. ‘General’ Monro was captured and, a few days later,
hanged outside his front door. The rebellion in the north-east was over.

Vinegar Hill

With the rebels scattered in the north, attention shifted once again to
those still ‘out’ in Wexford, and the British Army laid plans to attack
their camp at Vinegar Hill. On 21st June, General Gerard Lake attempted
to surround Vinegar Hill with some 20,000 men, in four columns of
soldiers, in order to prevent a rebel breakout. Battle was joined. It
lasted about two hours: the rebels were mercilessly shelled, and
artillery carried the day. ‘The rebels made a tolerable good fight of
it’ wrote Lake, and then pronounced the ‘carnage … dreadful’ among
them; hundreds of men may have fallen on the field of battle, though
numbers managed to escape. Although a ‘little war’ continued in the
Wicklow mountains for some time afterwards, in effect, after Vinegar
Hill, the rebellion in the south-east was over.

In defeat, rebel discipline collapsed in some places. After the defeat
at New Ross, about 100 loyalists had been killed at a barn in
Scullabogue; and now, following the disaster at Vinegar Hill, about 70
prisoners were piked to death on the bridge at Wexford town. The British
Army repaid these atrocities with interest: the mopping-up operations
after Vinegar Hill were little other than rape, plunder and murder.

Retribution for the rebel leaders was swift and uncompromising. Bagenal
Harvey, Cornelius Grogan, Mathew Keogh, and Anthony Perry – all Wexford
commanders – were executed; their heads were cut off and stuck on spikes
outside the courthouse in Wexford town. Father John Murphy, the hero of
Oulart and Enniscorthy (or a latter-day mixture of Attila, Genghis Khan
and Tamerlane, as loyalists viewed him), was captured in Tullow, County
Carlow. He was stripped, flogged, hanged, and beheaded: his corpse was
burned in a barrel. With an eye for detail, the local Yeomanry spiked
his head on a building directly opposite the local Catholic church, and
with great glee, they forced the Catholics of Tullow to open their
windows to admit the ‘holy smoke’ from his funeral pyre.

For a brief period in late August, there appeared a prospect that the
rebellion would rise up again. On 22nd August, a French force of some
1,100 men, under the command of General Humbert, came ashore at
Kilcummin Strand, near Killala, County Mayo. Humbert scored a striking
victory at Castlebar, but then his campaign ran out of steam. It soon
became clear that the apparent signal victory at Castlebar was an empty
triumph. On 8th September at Ballinamuck, County Longford, the French
force, vastly outnumbered, laid down its arms. The French were treated
as honoured prisoners of war, but those Irish auxiliaries who had
recklessly joined them were promptly massacred. The rebellion was
finally over: between 10,000 and 25,000 Irish (including a high
proportion of non-combatants), and around 600 British soldiers had died,
and large areas of the country had been effectively laid waste.

Legacy

The 1798 rebellion, and its aftermath, evoked memories of the bloody
rebellion of 1641. The very fact that a rebellion had occurred at all
called into question the future of the Irish political structure.
Marquis Cornwallis had been charged in June 1798 not only with crushing
the rebellion, but also with seizing the opportunity the crisis offered
to put through a legislative union between Ireland and England. The
Union was represented as the perfect means to crush the Irish who had
sought to gain their freedom.

The founding of the United Irishmen, with its aims for an international
brotherhood and for the inauguration of an Irish fellowship of freedom,
continues to be valuable, some 220 years on. The memory of 1798 is a
proud inspiration, and the commemoration of the rebellion in historical
writing, popular literature, and ballads continues to fascinate and to
inspire.

Across the pond the bonds are secured. Up the AOH

Posted by Jim on May 29, 2018

Two great Hibernians meet in Ireland to secure the bonds that tie us together.

President Gerry McGeough of the County Tyrone AOH with Martin Galvin New York State AOH Freedom for All Ireland Chairman and Bronx Division President

Month of Our Lady

Posted by Jim on

May 29, 2018
Month of Our Lady
Dear friends in the Lord:
This Sunday we will celebrate the beautiful feast of the Body and Blood of Christ, Corpus Christi, where in a special way we honor the Real Presence of Jesus in the Most Holy Eucharist. Allow me to tell you about a series that may shed light on this incredible mystery of our faith and make Mass even more meaningful: Presence: The Mystery of the Eucharist, available on FORMED.org.
It just so happens that this year Corpus Christi is celebrated the week after Memorial Day, when we all remember and honor the sacrifices made by those who gave their lives in service to our beloved country. On Memorial Day, we remember those who made the ultimate sacrifice. Each Sunday, at Mass, we also remember that Jesus, on the night before He died for us, gave us the gift of the Eucharist to nourish and strengthen us. As important as that memory is, there is something even greater: we have the opportunity to receive the very presence of Jesus in Holy Communion.
You might have heard that the Church describes the Eucharist as the “source and summit” of the Christian life. Have you ever wondered what that really means? Do you want to deepen your experience of God’s presence when you receive Him at Mass? As we prepare to celebrate Corpus Christi, I invite you to view Presence: The Mystery of the Eucharist, a new three-part series available on the website FORMED.org. Thousands of Catholics across the archdiocese are currently using FORMED.org, which has movies, books, bible studies and programs for Catholics of all ages. In this newest series, Presence seeks to answer a question that is simple, yet incredibly important: What is so special about the Eucharist?
Many parishioners in the archdiocese have already begun watching Presence, and the response has been overwhelmingly positive. If you have not yet signed up, don’t worry! All you need to do is send an email to formed@archny.org with the name of your parish and you will receive assistance. Hopefully, you will take this opportunity to grow in understanding just how much God loves you, and how His loving presence is available to you in such a special way at each and every Mass.
With prayerful best wishes, I am,
Faithfully in Christ,
Timothy Michael Cardinal Dolan
Archbishop of New York

Disingenuous to use Luther’s teaching as showing way to unity

Posted by Jim on May 28, 2018

IRISH NEWS

Letters to the Editor

Fr Sean McManus (May 21) enquired whether Free Presbyterian congregations were in the dark regarding ecumenical advances, as he continues to mull over my article printed in The Bulwark about the Mass. It can never be argued that congregations affiliated to the Presbytery of Ulster are ignorant about ecumenism.  One of the prime reasons why the denomination was formed in 1951 and why thousands have been led by the Holy Ghost to join our ranks, is because of the ecumenical trend that exists within certain Protestant denominations.

This is not the real question.
I would suggest another more pertinent question: Is ecumenism a biblical approach towards Catholicism?

Fr McManus has chosen to present ‘the great Martin Luther’ as an exemplar whose teachings on the Eucharist can help to provide common ground between Protestantism and Catholicism.
My article (I wonder how many who criticise my words have read the article?), highlighted this very issue. I agree that Luther did accept the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, but he also rejected transubstantiation, believing that while the Son of God became present in the sacrament, the essence of the bread and wine remained unchanged. This became a hot debate between the Lutheran and the Reformed Churches, led by John Calvin.

It is somewhat disingenuous, however, for Fr McManus to use Luther’s teachings as a light showing the way to unity with the Papacy.  One of the German Reformer’s most influential works, published in 1521 was ‘The Babylonian Captivity of the Church’. Perhaps it would be more appropriate to hear from Luther himself rather than the opinion of a commentator in the form of Lyndal Roper.

In Luther’s introduction he described the theology of Rome as propping up an idol, by the way in which the Papacy was elevated. What would he have made of the more modern invention of Papal Infallibility, when the Pope speaking Ex Cathedra defines faith and morals for all Christians?

Luther went onto to argue that the true Church was held in captivity because of the way the Papacy had corrupted the sacraments. In this work he reduced the sacraments from seven to three, reserving his most intense criticism for the corruption of ordination and the office of the priesthood.

Has the Roman Church changed since the days of Luther? Does the Papacy continue to dominate? Can the Church of Christ exist without being in subjection to the Pope?

Yes, it is sadly true that some Protestant Churches have capitulated and have become part of a process leading their flocks back into the Babylonian bondage that Luther so boldly and bravely broke free from.   We call on Christians to resist this trend, not only by objection but by separation because truth cannot mix with error.

Rev PETER McINTYRE
Clogher, Co Tyrone

Official Communication from the UFA

Posted by Jim on May 27, 2018

May 25th

MEMORIAL MASS & PLAQUE DEDICATION On Thursday, May 31, at 11:00 AM, a Memorial Mass will take place at the quarters of E279/L131, 252 Lorraine Street, Brooklyn, followed by a Plaque Dedication to honor the legacy of James “Perk” Perkins. All off-duty members are invited to attend. Members are requested to attend in dress uniform.
46TH ANNUAL FUN CITY BOWL On Saturday, June 2, the FDNY Bravest Football Club will be playing the NYPD Finest Football Club in the 46th Annual Fun City Bowl.  This year’s game will once again be played at MCU Park, 1904 Surf Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11224.  Kick-off is scheduled for 5:00 PM.  The parking lot at MCU Park will be open and tailgating is encouraged so bring some friends out for a great evening of fun.  Tickets are $20 for adults with children under 12 admitted for free.  Tickets will be available at the gate or you can get tickets from any member of the team.
MARTIN J. EGAN JR. 5K MEMORIAL RUN/WALK On Sunday, June 3, 2018, at 10:00 AM, the 12th Annual Marty Egan 5K Memorial Run/Walk will be held in Midland Beach picnic area, Lincoln Avenue and Fr. Capadanno Blvd., Staten Island, NY. Pre-registration is $20, Race day registration is $25. Pre-registration, T-shirt and bib pickup will be held on Thursday, May 31st, between 6:30-8:30pm at Grant City Tavern, Fremont Ave. and South Railroad Ave., Staten Island, NY. There will be a kid’s fun run (no fee, medals to all) and other activities for kids, along with food and beverages. Proceeds go to a scholarship fund in Marty’s name. Applications can be obtained online at www.sirunning.com. For more information call Mark Egan at 718-966-9493.   PLAQUE DEDICATION On Tuesday, June 5, 2018, at 1100 hours, a Plaque Dedication will be held honoring the memory of FF Raymond J. Pfeifer, E-40, who died on May 28, 2017. The dedication will take place in the quarters of E-40/L-35, 131 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY. All off-duty members and their families are invited to attend. Members are requested to attend in dress uniform.   FDNY BROOKLYN MEDAL DAY Brooklyn’s Medal Day Collation for D-8, D-11 and D-15 will be held Wednesday, June 6, 2018, at Brooklyn Army Terminal Pier, 140 58th Street, overlooking the NYC skyline. The collation will be hosted by E245/L161, E22/L157 and E216/L108. $25 admission includes DJ, food, drink t-shirt and mug. Follow Blue “Ferry to Manh Pier” sign. There will be plenty of parking. If travelling by subway, take the N/R line to the 59th Street Station.