Parallel talks taking place in Belfast and London

Posted by Jim on June 12, 2017

There was a surreal air in Belfast on Monday as talks aimed at
restoring power-sharing in the north of Ireland went ahead, even as the
DUP were separately negotiating to enter a deal on government with the
Tories in London.

With the talks in London still ongoing, there is to be a delay of some
days in the resumption of the Westminster parliament. The traditional
opening, where the English queen declares an agenda for government from
the throne, has been postponed.

The planned ‘Queen’s Speech’ on June 19 had already been due to clash
with the start of Brexit talks, and both are now expected to be
delayed.

Following the results of last week’s general election, the
Conservatives narrowly lost their overall majority and Tory leader
Theresa May immediately turned to hardline unionists for the necessary
support. Few details have so far emerged of the talks between the DUP
and Tory delegations, however, their planned coalition has infuriated a
wide section of British society. There has been a stream of hostile
commentary in the mainstream media about the North’s dominant unionist
party and its history of bigotry and paramilitarism.

Tory backbenchers, already furious at the electoral setback following a
disastrous election campaign by Theresa May, could yet object to the
deal amid calls for May to step down as party leader.

Up for discussion in the talks are said to be the resumption of all
sectarian marches by the Orange Order, including the notorious Drumcree
parade through the nationalist Garvaghy Road in Portadown.

Also likely to be included in the discussions will be impunity for
loyalist paramilitaries and British military war criminals. Other key
issues include the unionist veto against political change at Stormont,
human rights and the legal status of the Irish language.

Amid continuing questions over a half-million-pound donation to the DUP
towards the Brexit campaign effort, the DUP is also said to be
insisting that the extreme right-wing Nigel Farage, former leader of
UKIP, is handed a role in the Brexit negotiations with the EU.

The discussions may also include a guarantee that no referendum on
Irish unity will take place in the lifetime of the parliament, and a
gerrymander of proposed changes to the North’s 18 electoral
constituenciess.

Leading his party’s delegation at Stormont outside Belfast, Sinn Fein
president Gerry Adams said that any deal between the DUP and the
Conservatives to prop up a Theresa May-led government would be a
“coalition for chaos”.

Mr Adams was speaking at a press conference at Stormont with the party’s
seven Westminster MPs by his side.

“We don’t believe that any deal between the DUP here and the English
Tories will be good for the people here. Any deal that undercuts in any
way the process here of the Good Friday and other agreements is one that
has to be opposed by progressives,” he said.

Mr Adams added there was a “huge onus” on Taoiseach Enda Kenny and the
incoming Taoiseach Leo Varadkar to “ensure that all aspects of these
agreements are implemented”.

Earlier, Mr Varadkar said the British government should not become too
close to any party in the North of Ireland. “Our role as governments
here in Dublin and in London is to act as co-guarantors and not to be
close to any particular party,” he said.

Mr Adams warned on the consequences of Brexit and said Sinn Fein would
not reject any positive deal that might emerge from these DUP-Tory
talks. “We never turn up our nose at good deals. Let’s wait until we see
what sort of deal is done,” he said.

Mr Adams also said there was no pressure on Sinn Fein to end its
Westminster abstentionist policy. “There is no pressure on Sinn Fein to
do anything except fulfil the mandate that we received” in the
Westminster election.

While he said that Mr Brokenshire should not chair the talks, he added
that he had nothing personal against him, but the British government was
partisan and a player in the talks.

SDLP leader Colum Eastwood insisted Brokenshire could not be an
impartial chairman. “If James Brokenshire thinks for one second that he
can be an independent arbiter, an independent chairman of these talks he
is absolutely wrong,” he said.

An independent person was required to chair the talks “otherwise they
are going nowhere”, added Mr Eastwood.