UUP refuses to reveal action against suspended member over Irish tricolor remarks
Posted by Jim on February 16, 2017
Connla Young. Irish News. Belfast. Thursday, February 16, 2017
THE Ulster Unionist Party has refused to reveal what action has been taken against a party member suspended after he voiced support for the burning of Irish tricolors on loyalist bonfires.
Jim Sands made the remarks after tricolors and nationalist election posters were burned on âEleventh nightâ bonfires across the north last July.
He described the tricolor as âthe flag of a foreign, hostile countryâ and also defended the burning of election material on pyres.
âWhat is the problem burning Republic of Ireland flags? For some the tricolor is seen as the flag of a hostile foreign country,â he said.
âEven today that country still claims jurisdiction over Northern Ireland and interferes in the affairs of Northern Ireland at every opportunity.
âFor my liking you couldnât have enough tricolors on the bonfire.â
Mr. Sands, who stood for election to Antrim council in 2005 and received just 38 votes, also justified the burning of election posters.
âIt is a peaceful way of young people expressing your displeasure at someoneâs politics especially for someone too young to vote,â he said.
Days after he made the comments the UUP confirmed publicly it had suspended Mr. Sands from the party.
However, when asked about the status of Mr. Sands this week a spokesman said: âWe donât comment on individual party businessâ.
Mr. Sands, who had been a board of governors at Antrim Grammar School, which is attended by more than 700 children from both Catholic and Protestant backgrounds and has âInternational Schoolâ status, later resigned the post.
At the time the school said the UUP politicianâs comments did ânot represent their corporate views nor do they reflect the ethos and inclusive nature of the schoolâ.
The controversy came after the areaâs Ulster Unionist MP Danny Kinahan was criticized for tweeting a picture of himself standing in front of a bonfire topped by a tricolor.
He later apologized saying it was an error of judgment.